1. Withdrawal of VAT Exemption for Research Services This was presented at the Research Services Support Conference 1 st July 2013 and represents guidance on the changes as known at that time. HMRC’s principal guidance on this matter is contained in Revenue & Customs Brief 10/13. Supplementary guidance on transitional arrangements is expected to be issued by HMRC and will be published here once details are available. Revenue & Customs Brief 10/13 19 th July 2013

2. Withdrawal of VAT Exemption for Research Services Louise Bissell – Head of Corporate Accounts June Harris – VAT Manager James Gillen – Senior VAT Assistant

3. Current position: Income received by the University for research purposes can be: Vatable at the standard rate, (e.g. commercial contracts) Vatable at the zero rate (e.g. overseas, EU VAT registered) Exempt from a VAT charge (e.g. universities) Outside the scope of VAT (e.g. RCUK and charities)

4. With effect from 1 st August 2013: Exempt from a VAT charge (or is treated as VAT exempt) will no longer apply Currently exempt: Supplies of research between ‘eligible bodies’ e.g. Payment (consideration) received by UoM (an eligible body for research purposes) for research services provided to another eligible body Payment made by UoM for receipt of research services provided by another eligible body

5. What is an eligible body? UK universities UK public bodies e.g. Local Authority, Government Department, Health Authority etc. Non-profit making organisations that meet certain conditions

6. Background to withdrawal of exemption EC notified the UK that exemption for supplies of research did not comply with European legislation Germany had been similarly advised in 2002 HMRC Consultation held between December 2012 and March 2013 HMRC conclusion: widespread confusion regarding correct VAT treatment between ‘exempt’ and ‘outside the scope’ of VAT transactions Revenue & Customs Brief 10/13 issued April 2013

7. Effect of withdrawal of VAT exemption Currently: No material distinction between VAT exempt research income and outside the scope research income; no VAT due on income nor recoverable on expenditure From 1 st August ’13: Supplies of research between eligible bodies will become standard rated if not meeting certain criteria Impact: Cost of grant funded research will increase if part of work is subcontracted between Universities etc. VAT on related expenditure is recoverable except payroll costs (research costs mainly payroll related!)

8. Effect of withdrawal of VAT exemption RCUK Uni B Uni A Research supplied outside the scope therefore no VAT chargeable Research supplied now standard rated and therefore charged plus 20% Uni A cannot recover VAT on research supplies from Uni B – cost increases by 20%!

9. Outside the scope research Research funding which is collaborative and outside the scope of VAT will be unaffected by the change in legislation If sub-contracting services – then standard rated Therefore optimum is for research services between eligible bodies, e.g. universities, to be treated as outside the scope Four main scenarios....

10. Outside the scope research (continued) Scenario 1 Research which is funded by either the public sector or by the charitable sector Must be for the wider public benefit No direct benefit for the funding body

11. Outside the scope research (continued) Scenario 2 Research funded for the general public good Either not expected to generate any IP; or Reports or findings will be freely available to others

12. Outside the scope research (continued) Scenario 3 Collaborative agreement between different research institutions All parties to the grant are named on the application to the funding body (eg RCUK or charity or NHS) This is the key change for universities and key message from HMRC’s guidance

13. Outside the scope research (continued) Scenario 4 Where funding flows through one named party This party acts purely as a conduit passing on funds to others involved in the research project

14. Collaborative research HMRC definition ‘Where several bodies (typically universities or other eligible bodies) get together to apply for grant funding to undertake a research project. It is not uncommon for one of the applicants to be shown as the head or lead body which deals primarily with the funding body including receiving funding which is passed to other applicant bodies for their contribution to the project. For ease contracts are often concluded only in the name of the funding body and the lead research body even though this is a collaborative project’

15. Collaborative research (continued) HMRC also states that it: ‘Will accept in such cases of collaborative research, all research services provided by each of the bodies involved in the project are outside the Scope of VAT, even if the funding may be passed on by the lead research body to others and that only the lead research body is party to the contract with the funding body’. Best evidence: Partners named on the original application for funding

16. Current issues Late or substituted collaborators? Commercial parties? HMRC are expected to issue further guidance re. transitional arrangements from 1 st August 2013 Eg grandfathering of existing contracts? Guidance still outstanding

17. Actions to mitigate the effect of the withdrawal Identify all the research institutions who will be participating Ensure that they are all named on the funding application Where funding is received initially by a lead party – helpful if the funding body lists all collaborators in an annex to the grant letter If unsure – ASK THE VAT TEAM!

18. Any Questions?

19. Contact Details: Primary Contact: James Gillen (Senior VAT Assistant) Tel: 52165Email: james.gillen@manchester.ac.ukjames.gillen@manchester.ac.uk June Harris (VAT Manager) Tel: 52133Email: june.harris@manchester.ac.ukjune.harris@manchester.ac.uk Louise Bissell (Head of Corporate Accounts) Tel: 52528Email: louise.bissell@manchester.ac.uklouise.bissell@manchester.ac.uk