Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October 2013 2013 State Assessment Results and Analysis.

Published byBrice Hart Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October 2013 2013 State Assessment Results and Analysis."— Presentation transcript:

1 Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October 2013 2013 State Assessment Results and Analysis

2 Overview of State Assessments Grade 3 – 8: New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (ASK) Language Arts Literacy, Math Grade 4 and 8: Science ASK New Jersey Biology Competency Test (NJBCT) HSPA/AHSA: Language Arts, Math Field Testing: PARCC

3 Commissioner’s Convocation The fate of other states New Jersey State Assessments Common Core Content Critical Thinking

4 Goals of State Assessments: To measure and promote student achievement of challenging state curriculum standards. To provide accurate and meaningful information about student performance. To meet state and federal accountability requirements.

5 PARCC Field Testing Why? Examine the quality of items so that PARCC can build assessment forms for the 2014-2015 school year Test out assessment administration procedures Give schools and districts the opportunity to experience the administration of PARCC assessment Technology capacity Logistics Student experience

6 PARCC Field Testing What kind of testing? Performance-Based Assessment (PBA): March 24-April 11, 2014 End-of-Year Assessment (EOY): May 5 – June 6, 2014

7 Performance-Based Assessment English Language Arts/Literacy will involve literature analysis, narrative writing, and research simulation tasks. Students will read passages and write several pieces to demonstrate that they can: read and understand sufficiently complex texts independently, write effectively when using and analyzing sources, and build and communicate knowledge by integrating, comparing, and synthesizing ideas.

8 Performance-Based Assessment Mathematics will involve tasks requiring students to demonstrate that they can: solve problems involving key knowledge and skills, express mathematical reasoning and construct mathematical arguments, and apply concepts to solve/model real-world problems.

9 End-of-Year Assessment English Language Arts/Literacy Requires students to demonstrate their ability to comprehend a range of sufficiently complex texts, including literature, literary nonfiction, and information text from history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, engage in the reading of texts that require them to draw conclusions, interpret the meaning of words and phrases and technical vocabulary, and compare, integrate, and synthesize ideas presented in texts.

10 End-of-Year Assessment Mathematics Requires students to demonstrate their ability to solve multi-step problems, conceptual questions, applications, and carry out substantial procedures.

11 PARCC Field Testing School NameGradeSubject Area Number of Classes Mode of Admin. ComponentNumber of Sessions RHS9ELA2onlinePBA3 EMS8ELA2onlinePBA3 EMS7Math2onlinePBA2 LR6Math2onlinePBA2 LR5ELA2onlineEOY2 http://www.parcconline.org/sites/parcc/files/FrequentlyAskedQuestionsabouttheFiel dTest9-17-13.pdf

12 NCLB Design of new system: (370 schools) Priority Schools: low-performing schools in need of aggressive guidance due to low test scores and graduation rates Focus Schools: improvement needed in certain areas Progress Targets and Action Plans (reference March 2013 presentation)

13 Class of 2014 HSPA Results SubjectValid Scale Scores % Adv. Prof. % Proficient% Part. Prof. Language Arts Literacy 34132.066.02.1 Mathematics 34125.258.915.8

14 Roxbury 2013 State LAL Results compared with DFG (GH) and State ASK 3ASK4ASK 5ASK 6ASK 7ASK 8HSPA RSD6766.970.277.5 72.892.998.0 DFG (GH) 76.271.573.677.375.889.495.8 NJ66.459.461.366.265.281.998.0

15 Roxbury 2013 State Math Results compared with DFG (GH) and State ASK 3ASK 4ASK 5ASK 6ASK 7ASK 8HPSA RSD81.581.382.780.97482.684.1 DFG (GH) 86.786.288.185.572.779.186.9 NJ77.778.379.978.963.569.379.7

16 How Do We Use The Data? Test comparison: Analysis for trends. Cohort comparison: Compare students to their own performance in previous year. Analyze State and DFG comparison. Analyze results for sections within subject areas, the clusters, such as Number & Numerical Operations or Text Analysis. Check for growth in mean scale scores and Advanced Proficient. Analyze results for particular groups of students – schools, classrooms, ISL program, special education, etc.

17 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 3: LAL YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 20132462.864.232.9 20123002.368.529.2 20112505.767.227.1 20102972.464.533.1

18 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 4: LAL YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 20132905.96133.1 2012253254.643.4 20112954.565.530 20103455.353.141.6

19 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 5: LAL YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 20132489.360.929.8 20123023.76729.3 2011339660.533.5 20103239.563.726.8

20 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 6: LAL YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 20132984.073.522.5 20123418.168.723.3 201131710.665.823.5 201033411.568.619.9

21 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 7: LAL YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201333511.661.227.2 201232014.257.328.5 201133616.264.119.8 201022925.256.817.9

22 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 8: LAL YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201330912.380.67.1 201234019738 201132927.863.38.9 201032722.471.56.1

23 Test Comparison Based on Grade HSPA: LAL YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201334132.066.02.1 201239924.970.54.5 201135924.470.74.8 201041723.169.77.3

24 YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201324342.039.518.5 201230032.95017.9 201125039.445.814.9 201029735.551.513 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 3: Mathematics

25 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 4: Mathematics YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201328931.150.218.7 201225326.552.620.9 201129526.159.514.4 201034530.848.720.5

26 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 5: Mathematics YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201324837.545.217.3 201230227.459.513 201133936.952.910.2 201032331.256.212.6

27 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 6: Mathematics YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201329828.952.019.1 201234134.648.117.3 201131730.955.913.2 20103342254.823.2

28 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 7: Mathematics YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201333531.043.026.0 201232032.642.128.3 201133620.746.622.7 201032935.74321.3

29 Test Comparison Based on Grade NJ ASK 8: Mathematics YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201331044.538.117.4 201234044.940.514.6 201132946.336.217.5 201032734.747.517.8

30 Test Comparison Based on Grade HSPA: Mathematics YEARValid Scale Scores % Advanced Proficient % Proficient% Partially Proficient 201334125.258.915.8 20123992756.616.4 201135923.359.117.6 201041724.555.120.4

31 Another Way to Look at Data Monitor a class and compare scores over time. Cohort measurements…

32 Analysis Based on Cohort Class of 2021: Current 5 th Graders LAL% Adv. Prof. % Prof. % Par. Prof. 2013: ASK 4 5.961.033.1 2012: ASK 3 2.368.529.2 Math% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013: ASK 4 31.150.218.7 2012: ASK 3 32.95017.9

33 Analysis Based on Cohort Class of 2020: Current 6 th Graders LAL% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 ASK 5 9.360.929.8 2012 ASK 4 254.643.4 2011 ASK 3 9.562.6 27.9 Math% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 ASK 5 37.545.217.3 2012 ASK 4 26.552.620.9 2011 ASK 3 4740.312.7

34 Analysis Based on Cohort Class of 2019: Current 7 th Graders LAL% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 ASK 6 4.073.522.5 2012 ASK 5 3.76729.3 2011 ASK 4 4.565.530 Math% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 ASK 6 28.952.019.1 2012 ASK 5 27.459.513 2011 ASK 4 26.159.514.4

35 Analysis Based on Cohort Class of 2018: Current 8 th Graders LAL% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 ASK 7 11.661.227.2 2012 ASK 6 8.168.723.3 2011 ASK 5 660.533.5 Math% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 ASK 7 31.0 43.026.0 2012 ASK 6 34.648.117.3 2011 ASK 5 36.952.910.2

36 Analysis Based on Cohort Class of 2016: Current 9 th Graders LAL% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 ASK 8 12.380.67.1 2012 ASK 7 14.257.328.5 2011 ASK 6 10.665.823.5 Math% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 ASK 8 44.538.1 17.4 2012 ASK 7 32.642.128.3 2011 ASK 6 30.955.913.2

37 Analysis Based on Cohort Class of 2014: Current 12 th Graders LAL% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 HSPA 32.066.02.1 2010 ASK 8 22.471.56.1 Math% Adv. Prof. % Prof.% Par. Prof. 2013 HSPA 25.258.915.8 2010 ASK 8 34.547.517.8

38 Sample Data Disaggregated by Ethnicity: ASK 8 LAL% Adv. Prof.% Prof.% Par. Prof. White12.6 (30)81.6 (195)5.9 (14) Hispanic3.6 (1)85.7 (24)10.7 (3) Black080(12)20(3) Asian28 (7)64 (16)8 (2) Math% Adv. Prof.% Prof.% Par. Prof. White45.2 (108)39.3 (94)15.5 (37) Hispanic25.0 (7)53.6 (15)21.4 (6) Black20.0 (3)26.7 (4)53.3 (8) Asian76.9 (20)15.4 (4)7.7 (2)

39 NJ ASK 8 2013: Science % Adv. Prof.% Prof.% Par. Prof. 42.344.513.2

40 Example of Analysis NJ ASK 8 Science The partially proficient students included 20 General Education students and 21 Special Education Students. Focus of the test is on science practices. Form: Multiple-Choice & Short Constructed Response SCRs require students to explain or illustrate scientific concepts. DATA INFORMS INSTRUCTION & TRAINING: Instructional focus: developing students’ understanding and use of scientific processes Implementation of more SCR questions in student assessment

41 Biology Competency Test % Adv. Prof. % Proficient % Part. Prof. 201317.357.525.2 201218.559.521.9 201123.450.725.9 20102553.621.4

42 Partially Proficient & Lost Ground Proficient & Gained Ground 5 th grade ASK 2011 6 th grade ASK 2012 Proficient & Lost Ground Partially Proficient & Gained Ground

43 Analysis of Clusters

44 Conclusions Educational Goal 2012-2013: ACHIEVED! The partially proficient percentage will decrease by 5% on the language arts literacy portion of the NJ ASK for grades 3 through 8.

45 Always Moving Forward… 2013-2014 District Goal Improve student outcomes on NJ ASK grades 3-8 for English Language Arts Literacy. Specifically, an overall increase of two to four (2-4) percent in the number of pupils who move from partially proficient to proficient and/or proficient to advanced proficient.

46 down a golden path… Teachers of Mathematics and English Language Arts Literacy in Grades 3-8 will achieved a 100% implementation rate utilizing the Renaissance Learning (Star Math/Star Reading) program.

47 towards our… Teachers and Principals are working together to create meaningful Student Growth Objectives.

48 VISION. Preparing the children of today for tomorrow… Please know that I’m here and open to questions. It takes parents, teachers, and administration working together to make progress. Progress can only happen when we all come from a place of understanding, and we share a vision. Feel free to contact me at lradulic@roxbury.org or 973-584-6799, ext. 5002.lradulic@roxbury.org

Download ppt "Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October 2013 2013 State Assessment Results and Analysis."

Similar presentations

Mark J. Raivetz Superintendent Elizabeth Mennig Supervisor Teaching and Learning 21 October 2010 Assessment in the Haddon Township Public Schools 2010.

Mark J. Raivetz Superintendent Elizabeth Mennig Supervisor Teaching and Learning 21 October 2010 Assessment in the Haddon Township Public Schools 2010.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.

Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
Grandview’s PARCC Presentation October 14, 2014. Welcome! Presenters Presenters Meghan MacMillan Meghan MacMillan Regina Vassilatos Regina Vassilatos.

Grandview’s PARCC Presentation October 14, Welcome! Presenters Presenters Meghan MacMillan Meghan MacMillan Regina Vassilatos Regina Vassilatos.
Stepping Up with PARCC All students deserve access to a world-class education that will prepare them for success in college and careers. To work toward.

Stepping Up with PARCC All students deserve access to a world-class education that will prepare them for success in college and careers. To work toward.
State Testing PARCC, LEAP, iLEAP. What State Assessments will your children take this year? When will they take them ? All students grades 3-8 will take.

State Testing PARCC, LEAP, iLEAP. What State Assessments will your children take this year? When will they take them ? All students grades 3-8 will take.
Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.

Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.
Tewksbury Township Schools “ Measuring Our 2012 Results ” District Testing Report 2011-2012 NJ PASS Grades 1 and 2 NJ ASK Grades 3-8 Prepared for the Tewksbury.

Tewksbury Township Schools “ Measuring Our 2012 Results ” District Testing Report NJ PASS Grades 1 and 2 NJ ASK Grades 3-8 Prepared for the Tewksbury.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.

Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
State Assessment Results October 2014 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Dawn Moore Director of Curriculum and Instruction The Warren Hills Regional.

State Assessment Results October 2014 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Dawn Moore Director of Curriculum and Instruction The Warren Hills Regional.
The Parent’s Guide to The Common Core and PARCC Assessment Keansburg School District February 2015.

The Parent’s Guide to The Common Core and PARCC Assessment Keansburg School District February 2015.
Next Generation of Assessments Paula Mahaley ∙ January 27 and 28, 2014.

Next Generation of Assessments Paula Mahaley ∙ January 27 and 28, 2014.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Outline of PARCC Information *Parent/Student Resources, are noted at the end of this.

The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Outline of PARCC Information *Parent/Student Resources, are noted at the end of this.
1. Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including Common Core 2 The Oklahoma C 3 Standards, including the Common Core, lay the foundation toward ensuring that students.

1. Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including Common Core 2 The Oklahoma C 3 Standards, including the Common Core, lay the foundation toward ensuring that students.
Division of Assessment and Accountability Reporting ISAT Summative Scores to Parents.

Division of Assessment and Accountability Reporting ISAT Summative Scores to Parents.
10/10/14. PARCC is designed to reward quality instruction aligned to the Standards, so the assessment is worthy of preparation rather than a distraction.

10/10/14. PARCC is designed to reward quality instruction aligned to the Standards, so the assessment is worthy of preparation rather than a distraction.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.
Secondary PARCC Tests Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.

Secondary PARCC Tests Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›

 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?

Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Moving Forward with the New State Assessment System.

Moving Forward with the New State Assessment System.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google