1. Proposal Preparation

2. Documents for June PAC  Full Proposal  Starting point is LOI + updates in EOI  Project Definition Report  Cost estimate  Excel-based WBS structure  Utilize  2e and LBNE costing data/models  DUE: MAY 1 (ish) 2 Alan Bross nuSTORM WS - Virginia Tech April 14th, 2013

3. Details I 1. Executive summary 2. Introduction 2.1. Motivation 2.1.1. SBL 2.1.2. ν interaction physics 2.1.3. Acceleratory and detector R&D 2.2. Facility overview 3. Theoretical and Experimental Motivation 3.1. SBL 3.2. interaction physics 3 Alan Bross nuSTORM WS - Virginia Tech April 14th, 2013

4. Details II 4. Facility 4.1. Primary proton beam 4.1.1. Extraction line 4.1.2. Beam line 4.2. Target Station 4.2.1. Target Module 4.2.1.1 Target 4.2.1.2 Horn 4.2.1.3. Pion production 4.2.2. Capture section (Quads) 4.2.3. Transport 4.2.4. Proton absorber 4.2.5. Civil 4.2.6. Pion production rate summary 4 Alan Bross nuSTORM WS - Virginia Tech April 14th, 2013

5. Details III 4.3. Pion injection 4.4. Decay ring 4.4.1. Lattice design 4.4.2. Magnets 4.4.3. Instrumentation 4.4.4. Pion extraction and  degrader 5 Alan Bross nuSTORM WS - Virginia Tech April 14th, 2013

6. Details IV 5. Near detector hall 6. Far detector design 6.1. Overview 6.2. Steel 6.3. Magnetization 6.3.1. Field maps 6.3.2. SCTL implementation design 6.4. Scintillator and WLS readout 6.5. Electronics 7. Far detector hall 6 Alan Bross nuSTORM WS - Virginia Tech April 14th, 2013

7. Details V 8. Performance 8.1. SBL 8.1.1. Event rates 8.1.2. Monte Carol and analysis 8.1.2.1. Neutrino event generation and detector simulation 8.1.2.2. Event reconstruction 8.1.3. Data Analysis 8.1.3.1. Appearance 8.1.3.2. Disappearance 8.1.3.3. Global fits 8.1.4. Sensitivities 8.1.4.1. Appearance channels 8.1.4.2. Disappearance channels 8.2. interaction study 8.2.1. Straw-man detector 8.2.2. e CCQE analysis 7 Alan Bross nuSTORM WS - Virginia Tech April 14th, 2013

8. Details VI 9. Accelerator R&D Opportunities 9.1. Low-energy muon beam 10. Costing 11. Conclusions and outlook A1. FFAG Ring Option A2. Totally active detectors a. Scintillator b. LAr A3. Extension to Long-baseline a. Overview for future program b. Detector parameters c. Performance 8 Alan Bross nuSTORM WS - Virginia Tech April 14th, 2013

9. I’m Tired Already!  However, the LOI was already close to the level needed for a Full Proposal  As we have seen over the last 2 days, there has been much progress since last June  Will have  Improved Analysis  Better understanding of the facility performance  A Project Definition Report  Third iteration on costing with much improved estimates in many areas 9 Alan Bross nuSTORM WS - Virginia Tech April 14th, 2013

10. Discussion & Volunteers