Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control The SPRINT Research Group* November 9, 2015 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939 R2 이성곤 /pf. 우종신.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control The SPRINT Research Group* November 9, 2015 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939 R2 이성곤 /pf. 우종신."— Presentation transcript:

1 A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control The SPRINT Research Group* November 9, 2015 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939 R2 이성곤 /pf. 우종신

2 Abstract Hypertension: highly prevalent in the US (≥ 60 yrs, 1 billion adults worldwide) ≥ 50 yrs, isolated systolic hypertension: most common SBP: independent risk predictor for coronary events, stroke, HF, & ESRD Tx. of HTN  Risk of cardiovascular disease outcomes↓, [incident stroke (by 35 ~ 40%), MI (by 15 ~ 25%), & HF (~ 64%)]

3 Background However, the target for SBP lowering is uncertain. Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)  Similar: SBP target of < 120 mm Hg & < 140 mm Hg but!> rate of stroke↓  Recent trial: SBP < 130 mm Hg vs < 150 mm Hg : no significant benefit of another stroke but! a significant benefit of risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

4 Method(1) Study Design and Oversight : Randomized, controlled, open-label trial 102 clinical sites in the US, including Puerto Rico. Study Population *Inclusion criteria ① At least 50 years old ② SBP i) 130 - 180 mm Hg: 0 or 1 medication ii) 130 - 170: ~ 2 medications iii) 130 - 160:~3medications iv) 130 – 150: ~4 medications

5 Method(2) ③ Risk (1 or more of the following) i) Clinical or subclinical cardiovascular disease other than stroke ii) CKD (eGFR of 20 ~ 59 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) : MDRD(Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) equation iii) Framingham risk score a 10-year risk ≥ 15% iv) Age ≥ 75 years Clinical CVD: MI, PCI, CABG, CE, Carotid stenting/PAD c revasularization /ACS, EKG change(GXT), Cardiac imaging+/AAA ≥ 5cm Subclinical CVD: Calcium score ≥ 400, ABI ≤ 0.9, LVH (past 2yrs)

6 *Exclusion criteria: Specific BP lowering medication, 2ndary HTN, Proteinuira, DM or prior stroke, PCKD, etc… Randomization and Interventions SBP target < 140 mm Hg (the standard-treatment group) or < 120 mm Hg (the intensive-treatment group). Method(3) monthly for the 1 st 3 mo.  /3 mo. thereafter

7 Method(4) All major classes of antihypertensive agents were included (strongest evidence for reduction in cardiovascular outcomes) ① Thiazide-type diuretics (1st-line agent): e.g. Chlorthalidone ② Loop diuretics (for participants with advanced CKD) ③ BB (for those with CAD) ④ CCB(preferred amlodipine) ⑤ ACEi or ARB(e.g. Azilsartan) Mean of 3 BP measurements at an office visit ; seated and after 5 minutes of quiet rest ; automated measurement system. Lifestyle modification was encouraged

8 Method(5) Study Measurements Demographic data were collected at baseline. Clinical and laboratory data: at baseline and every 3 months thereafter. A structured interview: every 3 months, self-reported CVD outcomes. Serious adverse events : fatal or life-threatening  clinically significant or persistent disability that required or prolonged a hospitalization or medical or surgical intervention (e.g. hypotension, syncope, injurious falls, e’ abnormalities, & bradycardia// AKI or ARF)

9 Study Outcomes Primary outcome: major CVD events = 1 st occurrence of MI, non MI ACS, stroke, HF, or death from cardiovascular causes. Secondary outcome: = individual components of the primary composite outcome Renal outcomes: 1) with CKD(eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) : eGFR ≥ 50% ↓, or  ESRD requiring long-term dialysis or KT. 2) without CKD: eGFR ≥ 30% ↓ or < 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 Method(6)

10 Result Study Participants (2010.11~ 2013.3) (planned average of 5 yrs)

11 CVD (yes vs. no), CKD (yes vs. no), Sex, Race (black vs. nonblack), Age (<75 vs. ≥75), SBP in 3 levels (≤132, >132 ~ <145 mm Hg, & ≥145 mm Hg)

12 *The mean SBP: 1yr 121.4 mm Hg(intensive-group) 136.2 mm Hg(standard-group)  Average difference: 14.8 *3.26 years of f/u, The mean SBP: 121.5 mm Hg(intensive-group) 134.6 mm Hg (standard-group)] The mean number of BP medi. 2.8 and 1.8, respectively..

13 The mean DBP: 1 yr 68.7 mm Hg(intensive-group) 76.3 mm Hg(standard-group)

14 562= 243 (1.65%/yr) intensive-group 319 (2.19%/yr) standard-group (HR, 0.75; 95% [CI]; P<0.001). 365 deaths 155(intensive-group) 210(standard-group) (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, ; P = 0.003) 43% lower (P = 0.005) intensive < standard Stopped early after a median f/u of 3.26 yrs ∵ primary outcome: intensive >> standard

15 No significant between-group difference, though the number of events was small. Intensive > Standard (1.21%/yr vs 0.35% / yr; P<0.001).

16 Primary outcome btw the groups was apparent at 1 yr Mortality btw the groups became apparent ≒ 2yrs

17 1793 (38.3%)/1736 (37.1%) (HR 1.04; P = 0.25) *Hypotension, syncope, e’ abnormalities, and AKI or ARF : more frequently in the intensive treatment gruop *but not injurious falls or bradycardia, Significantly less common in the intensive-treatment group 220 (4.7%)/118 (2.5%)  possibly or definitely related to the intervention (HR, 1.88; P<0.001) ≥ 75 years : were similar to those in the overall cohort.

18 Conclusion SBP < 120 mm Hg, as compared with < 140 mm Hg, in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events but without diabetes  lower rates of fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events and death from any cause. However, some adverse events occurred significantly more frequently with the lower target.


Download ppt "A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control The SPRINT Research Group* November 9, 2015 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939 R2 이성곤 /pf. 우종신."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google