Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 37 ECE 6341 1.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 37 ECE 6341 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 37 ECE 6341 1

2 Line Source on a Grounded Slab 2 There are branch points only at (even function of k y1 )

3 Steepest-Descent Path Physics  There are no branch points in the  plane (cos  is analytic). Both sheets of the k x plane get mapped into a single sheet of the  plane. 3 Steepest-descent transformation:

4 Steepest-Descent Path Physics Examine k y0 to see where the  plane is proper and improper: 4

5 SDP Physics (cont.) P: proper I: improper 5 II I I P P PP C

6 SDP Physics (cont.) Mapping of quadrants in k x plane 6 1 2 3 4 I LWP SWP I I I P P P P 4 1 1 4 3 2 2 3 C

7 SDP Physics (cont.) Non-physical “growing” LW poles (conjugate solution) also exist. 7 I LWP SWP I I I P P P P 4 1 1 4 3 2 2 3 C The conjugate pole is symmetric about the  /2 line:

8 SDP Physics (cont.) SDP: A leaky-wave pole is considered to be physical if it is captured when deforming to the SDP (otherwise, there is no direct residue contribution). 8 SDP LWP SWP C

9 SDP Physics (cont.) LWP: 9 SDP: (exists if pole is captured) The leaky-wave field is important if: 1)The pole is captured (the pole is said to be “physical”). 2)The residue is strong enough. 3)The attenuation constant  is small. Comparison of Fields on interface (  =  / 2 ): (from higher-order steepest-descent method)

10 SDP Physics (cont.) LWP captured: Note: The angle  b represents the boundary for which the leaky-wave pole is captured (the leaky-wave field exists). 10 SDP LWP

11 SDP Physics (cont.) Behavior of LW field: In rectangular coordinates: where 11 (It is an inhomogeneous plane-wave field.)

12 SDP Physics (cont.) Examine the exponential term: Hence since 12

13 Radially decaying: SDP Physics (cont.) LW exists: Also, recall that 13 LW exists LW decays radially Line source

14 Power Flow 14 Power flows in the direction of the  vector.

15 Power Flow (cont.) Hence Note that Also, 15 Note: There is no amplitude change along the rays (  is perpendicular to  in a lossless region).

16 ESDP (Extreme SDP) ESDP Fast Slow We can show that the ESDP divides the LW region into slow-wave and fast-wave regions. The ESDP is important for evaluating the fields on the interface (which determines the far-field pattern). 16 The ESDP is the SDP for  =  / 2.

17 ESDP (cont.) (SDP) (ESDP) Recall that To see this: Hence 17

18 ESDP (cont.) Fast-wave region: Slow-wave region: Hence Compare with ESDP: 18

19 ESDP (cont.) ESDP Fast Slow The ESDP thus establishes that for fields on the interface, a leaky-wave pole is physical (captured) if it is a fast wave. LWP captured LWP not captured SWP 19

20 SDP in k x Plane SDP: We now examine the shape of the SDP in the k x plane. The above equations allow us to numerically plot the shape of the SDP in the k x plane. so that 20

21 SDP in k x Plane (cont.) (Please see the appendix for a proof.) LW SDP SW 21

22 Fields on Interface The leaky-wave pole is captured if it is in the fast-wave region. LW ESDP SW fast- wave region 22 The SDP is now a lot simpler (two vertical paths)!

23 Fields on Interface (cont.) The contribution from the ESDP is called the “space-wave” field or the “residual-wave” (RW) field. (It is similar to the lateral wave in the half-space problem.) 23 LW ESDP SW

24 Asymptotic Evaluation of “Residual-Wave” Field “Residual-Wave” Field Use 24 - +

25 Define 25 Asymptotic Evaluation of “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.) “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.)

26 Then Assume Watson’s lemma (alternative form): 26 We then have Asymptotic Evaluation of “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.) “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.)

27 It turns out that for the line-source problem at an interface, Hence Note: For a dipole source we have 27 Asymptotic Evaluation of “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.) “Residual-Wave” Field (cont.) Note that the wavenumber is that of free space.

28 Discussion of Asymptotic Methods We have now seen two ways to asymptotically evaluate the fields on an interface as x   for a line source on a grounded substrate: 1) Steepest-descent (  ) plane 2) Wavenumber ( k x ) plane There are no branch points in the steepest-descent plane. The function f (  ) is analytic at the saddle point  0 =  =  /2, but is zero there. The fields on the interface correspond to a higher- order saddle-point evaluation. The SDP becomes an integration along a vertical path that descends from the branch point at k x = k 0. The integrand is not analytic at the endpoint of integration (branch point) since there is a square-root behavior at the branch point. Watson’s lemma is used to asymptotically evaluate the integral. 28

29 Summary of Waves LW SW RW Continuous spectrum 29

30 Interpretation of RW Field The residual-wave (RW) field is actually a sum of lateral-wave fields. 30

31 Proof of angle property: Hence Appendix: Proof of Angle Property The last identity follows from or 31

32 As Hence Proof (cont.) On SDP: or (the asymptote) SDP SAP 32

33 ESDP: Hence To see which choice is correct: In the k x plane, this corresponds to a vertical line for which Proof (cont.) 33


Download ppt "Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2016 Notes 37 ECE 6341 1."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google