Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBarbra Cobb Modified over 8 years ago
1
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic of the electrochemical micromachining process. Figure Legend: From: Modeling of electrochemical micromachining: comparison to experiments J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 2008;7(3):033015-033015-7. doi:10.1117/1.2964215
2
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Variation of total (pulsed) current and Faradaic current with time. Figure Legend: From: Modeling of electrochemical micromachining: comparison to experiments J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 2008;7(3):033015-033015-7. doi:10.1117/1.2964215
3
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Laboratory setup of electrochemical micromachining. Figure Legend: From: Modeling of electrochemical micromachining: comparison to experiments J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 2008;7(3):033015-033015-7. doi:10.1117/1.2964215
4
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic of the electrolyte flow system. Figure Legend: From: Modeling of electrochemical micromachining: comparison to experiments J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 2008;7(3):033015-033015-7. doi:10.1117/1.2964215
5
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Variation of theoretical current density with voltage for different gap thicknesses and a at a constant electrolyte concentration of 0.1M. Figure Legend: From: Modeling of electrochemical micromachining: comparison to experiments J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 2008;7(3):033015-033015-7. doi:10.1117/1.2964215
6
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Variation of theoretical current density with voltage for different electrolyte concentration and at a constant interelectrode gap of 10μm. Figure Legend: From: Modeling of electrochemical micromachining: comparison to experiments J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 2008;7(3):033015-033015-7. doi:10.1117/1.2964215
7
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Comparison of theoretical and experimental MRR with variation of applied voltage at a gap thickness of 10μm. Solid line: Theory; Symbol: Experiment data. Figure Legend: From: Modeling of electrochemical micromachining: comparison to experiments J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 2008;7(3):033015-033015-7. doi:10.1117/1.2964215
8
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Comparison of theoretical and experimental MRR with variation of electrode gap at a voltage of 10V. Solid line: Theory; Symbol: Experiment data. Figure Legend: From: Modeling of electrochemical micromachining: comparison to experiments J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 2008;7(3):033015-033015-7. doi:10.1117/1.2964215
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.