1. draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations Gunter Van de Velde (editor), Tim Chown, Ciprian Popoviciu, Olaf Bonness, Christian Hahn IETF 66, July 12th 2006 Montreal, PQ

2. draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt Agenda Document Overview Changes made based on WG feedback Service Provider Case Study Next steps

3. draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt Document Overview This draft aims to provide address planning considerations for IPv6 deployments This draft also provides examples of address plans for different kinds of networks: Enterprise and Service Provider

4. draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt Document Overview (cont.) Planning considerations discussed within various scopes Network level Subnet level Host level Case Studies Enterprise Considerations – University of Southampton Service Provider Considerations – T-Systems

5. draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt Changes Made Based on WG Feedback Document was adopted as a WG work item Editorial changes Added a note on ULA vs (legacy) site-local addresses mentioning potential impact during renumbering and transitioning between the two types of addresses The Provider Independent address space was not discussed. Thoughts? http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2006_4.html Included a note on the NAP scattering principles when segmenting into /64 No discussion on multihoming

6. draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt Changes Made Based on WG Feedback (cont.) Added more detail on the structure of the Anycast address and usage considerations Embedded-RP section: Clarified text, mention that there are 15 possible addresses that can be used for Embedded RP (not for multicast in general) Using these addresses is not a ‘constraint’, i.e. you can use these addresses for non-RP devices, but you may regret it later, so just bear that in mind Noted that CGA addresses are indistinguishable and that similar considerations apply

7. draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt Service Provider Considerations Case Study: Planning considerations are analyzed from the perspective of the various roles played by the SP:  LIR  ISP  Network Access Provider Planning considerations are analyzed from the perspective of the entity that is assigned address space:  SP infrastructure  Large SP Customers  Small SP Customers Observations

8. draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt Next Steps Looking forward to additional feedback Review of the Service Provider case study that was added to the document Please send comments to main editor Gunter Van de Velde - gvandeve@cisco.com

9. draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt THANK YOU!