Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Project Overview The following resources were developed in response to requests from CADRE's Part C dispute resolution work group.* These training templates.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Project Overview The following resources were developed in response to requests from CADRE's Part C dispute resolution work group.* These training templates."— Presentation transcript:

1 Project Overview The following resources were developed in response to requests from CADRE's Part C dispute resolution work group.* These training templates are intended to help Lead Agencies (LA) prepare their dispute resolution practitioners (i.e., hearing officers, administrative law judges). It is expected that states will customize the content to bring it in alignment with their state regulations, policies, and procedures. Placeholder slides are included throughout the Modules, to suggest where LAs might insert and address key state-specific information such as state laws, regulations, policies and procedures. 1 *CADRE is the National Center for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special EducationNational Center for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education

2 The following individuals and organizations contributed to the development of this resource: Acknowledgements 2 Amy Whitehorne & Marshall Peter, CADRE Sharon Walsh, Walsh Taylor Consulting Megan Vinh, Western Regional Resource Center Joicey Hurth, Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center Hillary Tabor & Tina Diamond, US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs CADRE’s Part C Dispute Resolution Workgroup: Aileen McKenna & Linda Goodman, Connecticut Birth to Three System Kay Lambert, Kathy Bentz, & April Griffin, Texas Early Childhood Intervention Services Lenita Hartman, Early Intervention Colorado Mary Dennehy-Colorusso, Massachusetts Early Intervention Program Susan Boone, Mississippi First Steps Early Intervention Susan Ord, Utah Baby Watch Early Intervention Maureen Greer, Infant Toddlers Coordinators Association

3 Visiting Part C of IDEA: An Overview of Early Intervention (EI) For Part B Hearing Officers [Module A] 3

4 Purpose and Disclaimer The purpose of this Module is to orient hearing officers who are familiar with Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) with the Part C requirements. A more comprehensive collection of resources on Part C requirements may be found on the IDEA 2004: Building the Legacy website.IDEA IDEA 2004: Building the Legacy This Module is a technical assistance product intended for discussion purposes only and does not constitute legal advice nor is it intended to interpret law or regulation. 4

5 Module A: Overview Overall Outcomes of Modules Part C Words and Acronyms to Know Statutes and Regulations Part C Purpose & Findings Lead Agency Designations Key Differences between Parts C & B Overviews of Modules B, C, and D Implementation Issues Technical Assistance & Other EI Resources 5

6 Overall Outcomes of Modules 6 For Part B hearing officers to: Develop familiarity with Part C requirements, processes, and procedures Recognize key differences between Parts B & C Be knowledgeable about state-specific information relating to Part C Know where to locate Part C resources

7 NICHCY and OSEP have developed a training curriculum for The Basics of Early Intervention, including several handouts outlining key EI words and acronyms.*The Basics of Early Intervention Here are links to these resources: Acronyms in Early Intervention Nine Key Definitions in Early Intervention Part C Words and Acronyms to Know 7 * NICHCY is the National Dissemination Center for Children with DisabilitiesNational Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities OSEP is the US Department of Education Office of Special Education ProgramsUS Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs

8 Federal Statutes IDEA: 20 USC Chapter 3320 USC Chapter 33 Part B: Special Education and Related Services for Children with Disabilities Subchapter II – (sections 1411–1419) Part C: Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers (under three years of age) with Disabilities Subchapter III – (sections 1431–1444) 8

9 Regulations Federal Part B: 34 CFR Part 30034 CFR Part 300 Federal Part C: 34 CFR Part 30334 CFR Part 303 ECTA’s list of State Rules and RegulationsECTA’s list of State Rules and Regulations* 9 * ECTA is the Early Childhood Technical Assistance CenterEarly Childhood Technical Assistance Center

10 Statutes/Rules/Regulations/Policies State Specifics May want to link to: State Statutes State Rules/Regulations State Policies & Procedures State Application, or State Plan 10

11 Part C Purpose & Findings Congress established the EI program for infants and toddlers with disabilities in 1986, as Part H of the IDEA. In 1997, Part H changed to Part C, when the IDEA was reauthorized. Congressional findings supported the need to: Enhance the development of infants and toddlers with disabilities, to minimize their potential for developmental delay, and to recognize the significant brain development that occurs during a child’s first 3 years of life, Reduce the educational costs to society by minimizing the need for special education and related services when infants and toddlers reach school age, 11

12 Part C Findings (cont’d) Maximize the potential for individuals with disabilities to live independently in society, Enhance the capacity of families to meet the special needs of their infants and toddlers with disabilities, and Enhance the capacity of state and local agencies and service providers to identify, evaluate, and meet the needs of all children, particularly minority, low-income, inner city, and rural children and infants and toddlers in foster care. 12 See 20 USC § 1431 and NICHCY’s Module 1: The Basics of Early Intervention Trainer’s Guide (2012), pp. 1-3 & 1-4.20 USC § 1431Module 1: The Basics of Early Intervention Trainer’s Guide

13 Lead Agency Designations Each state’s EI program has a Lead Agency (LA) designated or established by its governor. The LA is responsible for general administration, supervision, monitoring, funding, and interagency coordination of EI programs and activities in the State. LA designation is subject to change at any time.LA is responsible for Many different types of departments/agencies/offices are designated as LAs, including: designated as LAs Health – 28 states Education – 13 states Developmental Services – 4 states Economic Services/Public Welfare – 3 states Human Services – 2 states Early Learning – 2 states Co-lead agencies (Education & Human Services) in 2 states 13 Note: The list of types of designated Lead Agencies was current as of April 2012.

14 Lead Agency Designation State Specifics 14 STATE’s LA is: Name of the Program/Agency/Dept. Historical information Point of interest Insert image of agency logo State Lead Agency

15 Key Differences between Parts C & B 15 Part C (Birth through Age 2)Part B (Ages 3-21) Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) Individualized Education Program (IEP) EI Services Provided in Natural Environments Special Education & Related Services Provided in the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) Developmental/Learning FocusEducational Focus Child & Family-focusedStudent-focused Service Coordinator for Each Child & Family No Requirement for Service Coordination Fees PermissibleNo Fees Permitted No FAPE RequirementFAPE Required Lead Agency (LA)State Education Agency (SEA)

16 Module B: Early Intervention Steps 16 1)Referral 2)Evaluation/Assessment/Eligibility 3)Initial IFSP Meeting/Development of IFSP 4)EI Services Provided to Child & Family 5)IFSP Reviewed & Revised Every 6 Months, or As Needed 6)Annual Review of IFSP 7)Transition Plan Included in IFSP 8)Child Exits EI

17 Module C: Procedural Safeguards 17 General Responsibility of Each LA Confidentiality & Records Parental Consent Prior Written Notice Surrogate Parents Dispute Resolution Options

18 Module D: Administrative Areas 18 State System Setup Personnel Standards Comprehensive System of Personnel Development Fiscal Issues

19 19 Implementation Issues Identified Due Process and Mediation Requests Source: Bradley, M.C., et al. (2011). IDEA National Assessment Implementation Study Final Report. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Education Services National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, p.123.IDEA National Assessment Implementation Study Final Report. EI Services in the IFSP Environment/Setting Family Cost Evaluation for EI Services Transition Eligibility for EI Services Procedural Safeguard

20 And we’re here to help when you need us… 20

21 OSEP Policy Letters of Clarification Related to Part C Analysis of Comments & Changes to Part C Federal Regulations OSEP Policy Letters of Clarification Related to Part C Analysis of Comments & Changes to Part C Federal Regulations (September 28, 2011) OSEP Resources 21

22 CADRE www.directionservice.org/cadre / ECTA Center www.ectacenter.org / NICHCY nichcy.org/laws/idea/legacy/partc ITCA www.ideainfanttoddler.org / DEC/CEC www.dec-sped.org www.directionservice.org/cadre / www.ectacenter.org / nichcy.org/laws/idea/legacy/partc www.ideainfanttoddler.org / www.dec-sped.org Technical Assistance & Other EI Resources 22


Download ppt "Project Overview The following resources were developed in response to requests from CADRE's Part C dispute resolution work group.* These training templates."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google