Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Firearms Removal/Retrieval in Cases of Domestic Violence Kelly Roskam Legal Director Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Firearms Removal/Retrieval in Cases of Domestic Violence Kelly Roskam Legal Director Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence."— Presentation transcript:

1 Firearms Removal/Retrieval in Cases of Domestic Violence Kelly Roskam Legal Director Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence

2 What is Removal? I will be using removal as a blanket term to define any process by which a respondent or defendant (in theory) no longer has possession of his or her firearms.

3 States With No Explicit Authority to Remove Alabama Arkansas Georgia Idaho Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi Oregon South Carolina Virginia Wyoming

4 Domestic Violence Restraining/Protective Orders Authorize: Alaska Arizona Delaware District of Columbia Florida Indiana Maine Nevada New Jersey North Dakota Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Dakota Vermont Washington Require: California Colorado Connecticut Hawaii Illinois Iowa Maryland Massachusetts Minnesota New Hampshire New York North Carolina Tennessee Washington West Virginia Wisconsin

5

6 Ex Parte Restraining/Protective Orders Authorize: Delaware Indiana Maine New Hampshire New Jersey North Dakota Pennsylvania South Dakota Washington Require: California Hawaii Illinois Maryland Massachusetts New York North Carolina Washington

7

8 Implicit Authority to Remove from Respondents of Domestic Violence Restraining/Protective Orders Alabama Arkansas Connecticut Idaho Kansas Kentucky Mississippi Montana Nebraska New Mexico Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Utah Virginia Wyoming In New Mexico, for example, when a judge issues any domestic violence order of protection, the judge may “order other injunctive relief as the court deems necessary for the protection of a party, including orders to law enforcement agencies as provided by this section.”

9

10 Components of Removal Process 1.Identifying Respondents with Firearms 2.Notifying prohibited possessors 3.Removal of Firearms 4.Storage or Sale of Firearms 5.Return of Firearms 6.Implementation 7.Data Collection

11 Identifying Respondents with Firearms

12 Sources Used by CA Detectives 1)administrative databases, including California’s Automated Firearms System (“AFS”), the Armed and Prohibited Persons System (APPS), and other relevant criminal justice sources; 2)copies of restraining orders to review the narrative of abuse submitted by petitioners; and in some cases; 3)interviews with petitioners.

13

14 Notifying Prohibited Persons Prioritize service of protective orders to armed respondents. Use trained law enforcement personnel to investigate and serve protective orders involving respondents with access to firearms. Communicate to respondents their options for complying with the firearm prohibition. Consider whether immediate surrender of firearms should be a standard practice for law enforcement agencies. Ask whether respondents to protective orders have guns when serving the orders.

15 Types of Removal Surrender Seizure Hybrid

16 Surrender In Colorado, a judge issuing a civil protective order that qualifies as an order described in 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(8) or (g)(8), shall order the person to “[r]elinquish, for the duration of the order, any firearm or ammunition in the respondent's immediate possession or control or subject to the respondent's immediate possession or control …”

17 Seizure In Illinois, a judge issuing an order of protection or an emergency order of protection “shall issue a warrant for seizure of any firearm in the possession of the respondent, to be kept by the local law enforcement agency for safekeeping.” 750 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 60/217(a)(3)(i) (West) (If the petitioner can establish that “there is good cause to grant the remedy, regardless of prior service of process or of notice upon the respondent, because: … the harm which that remedy is intended to prevent would be likely to occur if the respondent were given any prior notice, or greater notice than was actually given, of the petitioner's efforts to obtain judicial relief …”).

18 California In California, a law enforcement officer serving a protective order that indicates that the respondent possesses weapons or ammunition shall request that the firearm be immediately surrendered.” If the law enforcement officer makes no such request, the surrender shall occur within 24 hours of being served with the order. The law enforcement official or licensed gun dealer taking possession of any firearms or ammunition shall issue a receipt to the person surrendering the firearm at the time of surrender. The respondent shall file the original receipt with the court that issued the protective order and a copy of the receipt with the law enforcement agency that served the protective order within 48 hours of service of the order. If the respondent fails to relinquish the firearm within the aforementioned time period, California law authorizes the issuance of a search warrant.

19 To whom do respondents surrender? All states offer some variation which includes: 1.Law enforcement; and/or 2.Federally licensed firearms dealers; and/or 3.Third parties.

20 WARM Approach Law enforcement in California and Maryland employ a non- confrontational approach to persuade respondents to surrender firearms. Officers familiarize themselves with the circumstances surrounding violence that led to the order; seek information about firearms possessed by the respondent; dress in plain clothes and drive unmarked cars; treat respondents with empathy and respect; and emphasize the temporariness of the prohibition.

21

22 Role of Defense Attorneys Detectives in California and Maryland noted that in some cases defense attorneys were instrumental in convincing respondents to turn over firearms. California detectives noted that a common occurrence when they encountered resistance from a respondent was for the respondent to call his or her lawyer, only to be told “[t]urn over your guns or they will take you to jail.”

23 Removal Recommendations 1.Employ a hybrid model for firearm removal that authorizes law enforcement to remove guns from prohibited people and if that removal is unsuccessful, allow the court to issue a search warrant to complete the removal. 2.Adopt and implement post-service follow-up procedures to assure respondents and defendants are no longer in possession of their guns. 3.Establish qualifications and procedures for third-party surrender. 4.Consider the “WARM” approach for gun removal. 5.Explain the removal policy and how it is being enforced to defense attorneys. 6.Establish legal protections against self-incrimination for disclosing gun possession.

24 Storage or Sale of Firearms Maintenance and Safekeeping Identify or build structures to store firearms removed from prohibited people. Provide law enforcement with immunity from civil liability. Fees for Storage Allow law enforcement agencies storing firearms to charge respondents a fee. Option for Respondents to Sell Firearm Allow respondents to sell firearms.

25 Returning Firearms Return of Firearm Require a background check as a condition of returning firearms to prohibited possessors at the conclusion of their orders. Option for Law Enforcement to Dispose of Firearms Enact a policy to allow unclaimed firearms to be sold or destroyed. Notification to Petitioners of Return of Firearm Notify petitioners when firearms have been removed and when they are returned to the respondent.

26 Passage of the Law is Just the Beginning … Ensuring that stakeholders such as judges, judicial administrators, law enforcement officers, and prosecutors coordinate to implement the law is crucial.

27 Kelly Roskam kroskam@csgv.org http://efsgv.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Removal-Report- Updated-2-11-16.pdf


Download ppt "Firearms Removal/Retrieval in Cases of Domestic Violence Kelly Roskam Legal Director Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google