Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich Chapter 9 Structuring.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich Chapter 9 Structuring."— Presentation transcript:

1 Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich Chapter 9 Structuring System Requirements: Logic Modeling 9.1

2 Learning Objectives Use Structured English as a tool for representing steps in logical processes in data flow diagrams Use decision tables and decision trees to represent the logic of choice in conditional statements Select among Structured English, decision tables, and decision trees for representing processing logic Logic modeling and Internet applications 9.2

3 Logic Modeling Data flow diagrams do not show the logic inside the processes Logic modeling involves representing internal structure and functionality of processes depicted on a DFD Logic modeling can also be used to show when processes on a DFD occur 9.3

4 System development life cycle 9.4

5 Logic Modeling Deliverables and Outcomes Structured English Decision Tables Decision Trees State-transition diagrams Sequence diagrams Activity diagrams 9.5

6 Result from documenting the logic of a system ‘ s processes 9.6

7 Modeling Logic with Structured English Modified form of English used to specify the logic of information processes Uses a subset of English Action verbs Noun phrases No adjectives or adverbs No specific standards 9.7

8 Modeling Logic with Structured English Similar to programming language If conditions Case statements Figure 9-3 shows Structured English representation for Hoosier Burger 9.8

9 Current logical DFD for hoosier Burger’s invetory control system 9.9

10 Structured English representation of the four processes depicted in figure 9-2 9.10

11 Modeling Logic with Decision Tables A matrix representation of the logic of a decision Specifies the possible conditions and the resulting actions Best used for complicated decision logic 9.11

12 Modeling Logic with Decision Tables Consists of three parts Condition stubs  Lists condition relevant to decision Action stubs  Actions that result from a given set of conditions Rules  Specify which actions are to be followed for a given set of conditions 9.12

13 Modeling Logic with Decision Tables Indifferent Condition Condition whose value does not affect which action is taken for two or more rules Standard procedure for creating decision tables Name the condition and values each condition can assume Name all possible actions that can occur List all rules Define the actions for each rule Simplify the table 9.13

14 Figure 9-4 Complete decision table for payroll system example 9.14

15 9.15 Figure 9-5 Reduced decision table for payroll system example

16 Complete decision table for Hoosier Burger’s inventory reordering 9.16

17 Reduced decision table for Hoosier Burger’s inventory reordering 9.17

18 Modeling Logic with Decision Trees A graphical representation of a decision situation Decision situation points are connected together by arcs and terminate in ovals Two main components Decision points represented by nodes Actions represented by ovals 9.18

19 Modeling Logic with Decision Trees Read from left to right Each node corresponds to a numbered choice on a legend All possible actions are listed on the far right 9.19

20 Generic decision tree 9.20

21 Figure 9-9 Decision tree representation of the decision logic in the decision tables in Figures 9-4 and 9-5, with only two choices per decision point 9.21

22 9.22 Figure 9-10 Decision tree representation of the decision logic in the decision tables in Figures 9-4 and 9-5, with multiple choices per decision point

23 Deciding Among Structured English, Decision Tables and Decision Trees CriteriaStructured English Decision Tables Decision Trees Determining Conditions and Actions Second BestThird BestBest Transforming Conditions and Actions into Sequence BestThird BestBest Checking Consistency and Completeness Third BestBest 9.23

24 9.24 Compare decision table to decision tree

25 Summary Several methods of logic modeling Structured English  Primarily communication technique for analysts and users Decision Tables  Conditions are listed in condition stubs  Possible actions are listed in action stubs  Rules link conditions with actions 9.25

26 Summary Decision Tables Lists all possible rules Decision Trees Conditions are portrayed by decision points Values are represented by paths between decision points and ovals that contain actions 9.26

27 Summary Comparison of Structured English, Decision Tables and Decision Trees Most studies show that decision trees are best for many criteria There is no best technique Analyst must be proficient in all three 9.27


Download ppt "Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich Chapter 9 Structuring."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google