1. English Mastery Council Update District Policy Criteria Recommendations to the Nevada State Board of Education Dr. Magdalena Martinez, Chair - English Mastery Council Karl Wilson, Education Programs Professional - NDE December 11, 2014

2. Nevada’s Commitment In 2013, the Nevada State Legislature enacted Senate Bill 504 and amended NRS 388.405 with the following language: The Legislature finds and declares that: (a)It is the public policy of this State to provide every child enrolled in a public school with high-quality instruction. (a)Children who are limited English proficient benefit from instruction that is designed to address the academic and linguistic needs of those children. (a)It is the intent of the Legislature that children who are limited English proficient be provided with services and instruction which is designed to address the academic needs of such children so that those children can attain proficiency in the English language and improve overall academic and linguistic achievement and proficiency. 2

3. SB 504 Key Initiatives To further the support high-quality services for English learners, the Legislature enacted key initiatives: 1.Development of State policies; 1.Establishment of the English Mastery Council (EMC) to develop specific recommendations; and 1.Funding to support programs that serve English learners in Nevada’s public schools: Zoom Schools in Clark and Washoe County School Districts SB 504 funds to other school districts 3

4. State Board Responsibility NRS 388.405 established specific responsibilities. The State Board shall: (a)Adopt regulations prescribing criteria for a policy for the instruction to teach pupils who are limited English proficient which is developed by the board of trustees of each school district pursuant to NRS 388.407. (a)Submit all evaluations required pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 6801…to the: 1)Governor; 2)Legislative Committee on Education; 3)Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau for transmittal to the Senate and Assembly Standing Committees on Education; and 4)Board of trustees of each school district. 4

5. State Superintendent Responsibility The Superintendent of Public Instruction shall monitor each school district’s compliance with the criteria prescribed by the State Board pursuant to this subsection 5

6. Local School Board Responsibility The board of trustees of each school district shall develop a policy for the instruction to teach English to pupils who are limited English proficient. The policy must be designed to provide pupils enrolled in each public school located in the school district who are limited English proficient with instruction that enables those pupils to attain proficiency in the English language and improve their overall academic achievement and proficiency. 6

7. English Mastery Council (EMC) The English Mastery Council created by NRS 388.409 shall:NRS 388.409 1. Make recommendations to the State Board for the adoption of regulations concerning criteria for the policies to teach English to pupils who are limited English proficient that are developed by the board of trustees of each school district pursuant to NRS 388.407.NRS 388.407 2. Review annually each policy to teach English to pupils who are limited English proficient that is developed by the board of trustees of each school district pursuant to NRS 388.407 and make recommendations for improvement to the State Board and the applicable board of trustees.NRS 388.407 7

8. District Policy Criteria The English Mastery Council has developed District Policy Criteria recommendations for the State Board. According to NRS 388.407, the policy must: (a) Provide for the identification of pupils who are limited English proficient through the use of an appropriate assessment; (b) Provide for the periodic reassessment of each pupil who is classified as limited English proficient; (c) Be designed to eliminate any gaps in achievement, including, without limitation, in the core academic subjects and in high school graduation rates, between those pupils who are limited English proficient and pupils who are proficient in English; 8

9. District Policy Criteria (cont.) The policy must also: (d) Provide opportunities for the parents or legal guardians of pupils who are limited English proficient to participate in the program; and (e) Provide the parents and legal guardians of pupils who are limited English proficient with information regarding other programs that are designed to improve the language acquisition and academic achievement and proficiency of pupils who are limited English proficient and assist those parents and legal guardians in enrolling those pupils in such programs. 9

10. District Policy Criteria The EMC incorporated State and Federal requirements, as well as key judicial rulings related to services for English learners, in developing the District Policy Criteria recommendations. For future review of district policies and their implementation, the State will incorporate the principles outlined in the Castañeda v. Pickard decision (1981) which established a three-pronged test to evaluate the adequacy of a district’s program for English learners: 1.Theory: The district program must be based in “a sound educational theory.” 1.Practice: The programs and practices, including resources and personnel, must be able to “implement this theory effectively.” 1.Results: The programs have led to “effective outcomes of English language development.” 10

11. Future EMC Recommendations NRS 388.409 also directs the EMC to make recommendations to State Board of Education in the following areas: The adoption of regulations pursuant to NRS 391.019 concerning the requirements for an endorsement to teach English as a second language, including, without limitation, the teachers who should be required to obtain the endorsement…NRS 391.019 Develop standards and criteria for a curriculum for pupils who are limited English proficient and submit those standards and criteria to the State Board for consideration. The EMC is in the process of preparing those recommendations. 11