1. Resistive microstrip and microdot detectors: a novel approach in developing spark protected micropattern detectors P. Fonte 1, E. Nappi 2, P. Martinengo 3, R. Olivera 3, V. Peskov 3,4, P. Pietropaolo 5, P. Picchi 6 1 LIP, Coimbra, Portugal 2 INFN Bari, Bari, Italy 3 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 4. UNAM, Mecico city, Mexico 5.INFN Padova, Padova, Italy 6 INFN Frascati, Frascati, Italy

2. I.Introduction At the last three RPC conferences we reported that the resistive electrode approach, used in RPCs,can be successfully applied to micropattern gaseous detectors

3. Why it is necessary? Because anyone who plays with micropattern detectors can easily end up with something like this…

4. Our first spark-protected micropattern detectors (GEM and MICROMEGAS) had unsegmented resistive electrodes

5. During the last two years, passed between the last conferences, we developed micropattern detectors with segmented (on strips) resistive electrodes II.Resistive strip micropattern detectors

6. This approach turned out to be very fruitful allowing to developed different designs of spark-protected micropatteren detectors oriented on different applications

7. MSGC type (Oed type) Hole-strip type Microdot type Microstrip –microgap RPC (first tests) Today we will introduced the following detectors with resistive strip electrodes: As will be shown these detectors are optimal for some specific applications, for example: cryogenic detectors, photodetectors and others

8. II.1.MSGC/Oed type (the concept is known, the modification was the replacing of the metallic strips with the resistive one)

9. PCB with 5μm thick Cu layer on the top and two layers of readout strips (oriented perpendicularly) on the bottom Milled grooved 100 μm deep and 0.6 μm wide, pitch 1mm. The grooves were then filled with resistive paste (ELECTRA Polymers) By a photolithographic technology Cu 20 μm wide strips were created between the grooves 0.6mm 1mm 20μm a) b) c) d) 0.5mm e) Finally the entire detector was glued on a supporting FR-4 plate 0.2mm 0.1mm 0.5-1mm

10. A B C Anode contact pad Cathode contact pad Cathode strips Anode strips Electrically “weak” points (edges) Coverlay coating to avoid discharges on edges The new R-MSGC thus has the following three features: 1)very this metallic anode strips, 2) resistive cathode strips manufactured by filling grooves with a resistive paste, 3) a Coverlay layer to protect the edges against surface discharges. These three features allow the detector to operate at gas gains as high as it was achieved in the past with metallic MSGC manufactured on a glass substrate

11. Connections to X pick up strips Connections to Y pick up strips Anode strips Cathode resistive strips

12. A magnified photograph of the R-MSGC showing the left side of its active area near its edge. Cu anode strips, resistive cathode strips and the readout strips manufactured in the inner layer of the PCB (under the anode and the cathode strip) are clearly seen as well as the Coverlay layer.

13. II.2.Hole and strip hybrid detector (combines in one design R-MSGC and GEM) The concept is also known: MHSD (developed by Coimbra group), but with resistive electrodes

14. PCB with 5μm thick Cu layer Milled grooved 100 μm deep and 0.6 μm wide, pitch 1mm. The grooves were then filled with resistive paste By a photolithographic technology Cu 20 μm wide strips were created between the grooves 0.6mm 1mm 20μm a) b) c) d) 0.5mm e) The holes were drilled by the CNC machine Holes:

15. Back plane (metallic or resistive) Anode strips Resistive cathode stripsHoles 1mm 0.3mm 20μm

16. The important differences from MHSD* were that it was manufactured from a printed circuit plate 0.4 mm and had resistive cathode strips making it spark-protective.  J.M. Maia et al., NIM A504,2003, 364 Anode strips Cathode strips Holes

17. II.3. Strip-Microdot detectors The concept is also know, our modifications were essential: both resistive anode and cathode strips

18. a) Multilayer PCB with a Cu layer on the top and one layer of readout strips on the bottom, 1mm pitch Upper Cu layer etching The grooves were then filled with resistive paste (ELECTRA Polymers Removal of the Cu v v v v Filling with Coverlay to create isolated dots b) c) d) e) Microdot detector manufacturing steps: v v Resistive anode dotsResistive cathode strips Readout strips 1mm0.1mm

19. Photograph of the resistive microdot

20. Anode dots Electrodes edges

21. II.4. Microstrip-RPC The project just started!

22. a) Multilayer PCB with a Cu layer on the top and one layer of readout strips on the bottom, 0.5 pitch Upper Cu layer etching The grooves were then filled with resistive paste (ELECTRA Polymers Removal of the Cu v Filling with Coverlay (an option) b) c) d) e) Microstrip RPC manufacturing steps: Resistive strips Readout strips 0.5 mm0.2mm v 0.035mm 0.1mm

23. A B C Contact pad Contact pad Resistive strips Total resistivity of the zone B 500MΩ (adjustable) Resistivity of zones A and C 500MΩ (adjustable) Surface resistivity 100kΩ/□ (can be adjusted to exper. needs)

24. Magnified photograph of the inner surface of the microstrip RPC

25. Resistive strips Readout strips located below the resistive strips

26. From these plates RPC was assembled with gaps ether 0.5 or 0.18mm (note different current flow scheme compared to classical RPC) Film resistor 2D strip or various stereo strip arrangements to avoid ambiguity Usual RPC Microstrip RPC “Signal” electrodes Current Orthogonal resistive strips Current 500MΩ Inner signal strips

27. III. Experimental setup

28. A schematic drawing of the experimental set up used for tests at room temperatures or any other

29. A schematic drawing of the experimental setup used for tests of R-MHSP at room and cryogenic temperatures …

30. V. Results

31. IV.1. 2-D R-MSGC

32. Gas gain vs. the voltage applied between the anode and the cathode strips of an R-MSGC measured in Ne (squares) and Ne+7%CH4 (triangles) with alpha particles (filled symbols) and with 55Fe (empty symbols). The curves with rhombuses represent the energy resolution (FWHM at 6 keV) measured in Ne+7%CH4

33. Gain dependence on voltage applied to R-MSGC (between its anodes and the cathode strips) measured in Ar (blue triangles) and Ar+12%CH4 (red triangles). In all curves filled triangles- measurements performed with alpha particles, open triangles - 55Fe. Open rhombuses-energy resolution measured in Ar+12%CH4.

34. In all gases tested the maximum gains achieved with the R-MSGCs ~10 4 are as high as obtained with the best quality “classical” MSGCs manufactured on glass substrates

35. Results of measurements induced signals profile from the readout strip oriented along (green curve with crosses) and perpendicular to the anode strips of R-MSGCs (rhombuses, triangles and squares). Rhombus- the collimator is aligned along the strip #0. Triangles -the collimator was moved on 200μm towards the strip#1. Squares- the collimator was aligned between the strip#0 and # 1. Measurements were performed in Ar+10%CO 2 at a gas gain of 5x10 3. Preliminary results of measuremenst the induced signals on the strips: More precisely the position resolution will be determined during the oncoming beam test Profiles of signals induced on pick up strips (0.3mm wide collimator) Correlation between the measured and actual position of the collimator Expected Measured

36. Rate response: The gas gain variations with counting rate. Measurements were performed in Ne+10%CO 2 at gas gain of 510 3 (signal drop at counting rate >10 3 Hz/mm 2 is due to the PCB board surface charging up, but not due to the voltage drop on resistive strips) 10 3

37. IV.2. Some results obtained with hybrid detectors

38. R-MHSP Gas gain vs. the overall voltage (the voltage applied across the holes and between the anode and cathode strips) for hybrid R-MSGC measures in pure Ar at various temperatures: 293K, 150K and 108K Gains approaching 10 4 were achieved

39. IV.3. Microdot detectors

40. Gas gain vs. the voltage of R-Microdot measured in Ne and Ne+1.5%CH 4 with alpha particles (filled triangles and squares) and with 55 Fe (empty triangles and squares).

41. Gains gains of R-Microdot measured in Ar-based mixtures

42. In all gases tested the maximum gains achieved with the R-Microdot detectors were 3-10 time higher than with R- MSGCs

43. Gain (triangles) dependence on voltage applied to R- Microdot measured in Ar (blue symbols) and Ar+1.6%CH 4 (red symbols) and in Ar+9%CO 2. Filled triangles and squares -measurements performed with alpha particles, open symbols - 55 Fe. SQ streamers

44. Steamer simulations

46. Microstrip RPC This project is just started so all results are preliminary!

47. Gain estimation: CsI layer UV X-rays Fe anode 0.5mm 0.1-0.2mm

48. Preliminary estimations: no plateau, charging up, space charge( ?) Induced signal profile

49. The highest gains were obtained among all resistive micropattern detectors (to be discussed)

51. Comparison to other micropattern detectors (microstrip RPC is excluded from this discussion)

52. a) Comparison to GEM Advantages of R-MSGC compared to GEM: 1) Less elements 2) Ion back flow suppression (which is essential for photodetectors, TPC and so on) Standard GEM detector layout Readout plate Drift electrode One or several GEMs

53. b) Comparison to TGEM/RETGEM Similar gain, however fewer parts, potential for better position resolution

54. Note that gains achieved with R-MSGCs (~10 4 ) are comparable to those obtained with spark-protected MICROMEGAS having resistive anode strips (R-MICROMEGAS). The rate characteristics of R- MSGCs are also as good as those of R- MICROMEGAS. However, R-MSGCs have several advantages over R- MICROMEGAS: 1) R-MSGCs are easier to manufacture than MICROMEGAS, 2) It is easier to clean the formed dust particles (since there is no cathode mesh which blocks these microparticles) 3) There are fewer parts in R-MSGCs than in R-MICROMEGAS 4) Large area R-MSGCs can be assembled from patches with minimum dead spaces (in contrast to R-MICROMEGAS) Thus R-MSGCs appear to be a very attractive and competitive detector of photons and charged particles. c) Comparison to MICROMEGAS

55. V. Applications R-MSGCs can be used in many applications especially in those which requires ion or photon feedback suppression. Below examples of two applications are given on which our group is involved

56. V.1. Double phase noble liquid dark matter detectors Two parallel meshes where the secondary scintillation light is produced Primary scintillation light From the ratio of primary/secondary lights one can conclude about the nature of the interaction

57. Several groups are trying to develop designs with reduced number of PMs See: E. Aprile XENON: a 1-ton Liquid Xenon Experiment for Dark MatterXENON: a 1-ton Liquid Xenon Experiment for Dark Matter http://xenon.astro.columbia.edu/presentations.html and A. Aprile et al., NIM A338,1994,328; NIM A343,1994,129 Large amount of PMs in the case of the large-volume detector significantly increase its cost Another option for the LXe TPC, which is currently under the study in our group, is to use LXe doped with low ionization potential substances (TMPD and cetera). One large low cost “PM”

58. Event Charge hv Hybrid R-MSGC or R-Microdot CsI photocathode Shielding RETGEMs with HV gating capability LXe Implementation of hybrid R-MSGC In hybrid R-MSGC, the amplification region will be geometrically shielded from the CsI photocathode (or from the doped LXe) and accordingly the feedback will be reduced Multiplication region Anodes Resistive cathodes

59. V.2. Photodetectors

60. The VHMPID should be able to identify, on a track-by- track basis, protons enabling to study the leading particles composition in jets (correlated with the π0 and /or γ energies deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter). In the framework of the ALICE upgrade program we are investigating the possibility to build a new RICH detector allowing to extend the particle identification for hadrons up to 30GeV/c.It is called VHMPID. (HMPID)

61. The suggested detector will consist of a gaseous radiator (for example, CF 4 orC 4 F 10 ) and a planar gaseous photodetector The key element of the VHMPID is a planar photodetector C 4 F 10

62. RETGEM R-MSGC (or R-MICRODOT) Our previous prototype (very successful!) Advantages: Less elements, better ion back flow suppression Concerns: Aging (to be studied) New prototype (recently tested) P. Martinengo, V. Peskov, et al., NIM, 639,2011,126 V. Peskov et all., arXiv:1107.4314arXiv:1107.4314 (2011) 1-7 RE HMPID readout electronics Cherenkov light was detected

63. 1 10 100 FWHM (%) Gas gain of R-MSHC combined with CsI coated RETGEM (it is as high as was achieved with three RETGEMs operating in cascade mode) Gas gain curves measured in Ne+10%CO 2 : filled triangles –alpha particles, open symbols- 55 Fe. Open rhombuses-energy resolution. Blue triangles represent gas gain measures with a CsI-coated RETGEM preamplification structure. R-MSGC R-MSGC+CsI coated RETGEM

64. VI. Conclusions ● We introduced micropttern gaseous detetctors with segmented resistive electrodes : R-MSGCs R-MHSP R-Microdot and microstrip RPC(first results). ● They have several important advantages over other designs of resistive micropattern detectors, for example: fewer parts, simpler design, easier to assemble large area R-MSGCs from patches with practically no dead spaces and so on. In mass production an automatic procedure can be applied which will dramatically reduce the cost compared to other micropttern detectors ● We already tested R-MSGC combined with a CsI–RETGEM as a candidate for the ALICE VHMPID, and preliminary results are very encouraging ● The spark-protected hybrid R-MSGC will be an attractive option for the detection of charge and light from the LXe TPC with a CsI photocathode immerses inside the liquid. ● Another option for the LXe TPC, which is currently under the study in our group, is to use LXe doped with low ionization potential substances. In this detector the feedback will be also a problem and thus hybrid R-MSGC or R- Microdot will be also an attractive option.

65. Back up slides

66. R-COBRA As can be seen, with this detector operating in Ar at 115 K the maximum achievable gas gain was ~10 3 - a little less than in the case of the RE-MHSP. Presumably this is because the width of the anode strip in the RE-COBRA design is larger that in the RE-MHSP.

68. ATLAS R-MICROMEGAS characteristics T. Alexopoulos et al., NIM A640, 2011,110 10 3 Hz/mm 2 (2-3)10 4

69. In addition we investigate if microdot detectors (also fully abundant nowadays) can be made spark protective In the past the Microdot detector offered the highest maximum achievable gain among all micropattern detectors (S.F. Biagi, NIM A421, 1999, 234)

70. Optimization of the RPC electrodes resistivity for high rate applications P. Fonte et al., NIM A413,1999,154

71. For the sake of simplicity no special care was done about edges of the strips However these parts was “enforced” by resistivity MSGC edges