1. Development and Management of e-Repositories 08-12 April 2013 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium Implementing a Repository__________ Pauline Simpson IODE Group of Experts on Marine Information Management CCMI, Cayman Islands psimpson07@aol.com

2. Learning Outcome At the end of this session you will be able to: Understand the different types of repositories for appropriate purposes; plan the implementation of a repository knowing the issues that must be addressed and the options to allow you to make decisions. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

3. Content Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013  Repository types  Establishing a Repository  Planning  Issues

4. What is a Repository? Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013  A digital repository is a mechanism for managing and storing digital content.  Repositories can be subject or institutional in their focus.  Putting content into an institutional repository enables staff and institutions to manage and preserve it, and derive maximum value from it.  A repository can support research, learning, and administrative processes.  Repositories use open standards to ensure that the content they contain is accessible in that it can be searched and retrieved for later use  The use of these agreed international standards allows mechanisms to be set up which import, export, identify, store and retrieve the digital content within the repository.

5. Institutional Repository “a set of services that an institution offers to the members of its community for the managemnt and dissemination of didgital matrials created by the institution and its community members” Lynch, C. 2003 Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL BiMonthly Report, 226, 1-7. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

6.  Showcase for institutions research output  Marketing mechanism – internally and externally  Metrics and research management – repositories support process  Complies with research body requirements for open access publishing  Allows systematic management and preservation of digital assets  Encourages collaboration and inter-disciplinary work  Public engagement – community, business Benefits for institutions

7. Benefits for Researchers  Faster dissemination  Wider readership  Increased citation  Compliance with funders mandates  Secure environment to store own research output  Personalise services – statistics on downloads, personal profiles/bibliographies Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

8. Growth of Repositories in OpenDOAR

9. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Proportion of Repositories by Country Organizations may have more than one repository but each organization counted only once

10. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 http://repositories.webometrics.info

11. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Repository Types Worldwide

12. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Repository Types  Subject - arXiv, Cogprints, RePEC,  Institutional – Southampton, Glasgow, Nottingham (SHERPA), MBA UK, MBLWHOI  National - DARE (all universities in the Netherlands), Scotland, British Library (proposal)  National / Subject - name one in your own country?  International - Internet Archive ‘Universal’, OAIster, Aquatic Commons, OceanDocs  Regional - White Rose UK  Consortia - SHERPA-LEAP (London E-prints Access Project)  Funding Agency – NIH (PubMed), Wellcome Trust (UK PubMed), NERC  Project - Public Knowledge Project EPrint Archive  Conference - 11th Joint Symposium on Neural Computation, May 15 2004  Personal – peer to peer  Media Type - VCILT Learning Objects Repository, NTDL (Theses)  Publisher – journal archives  Data Repositories/Archives - NODC, BODC, DOD, JODC, BADC etc ***** Problem is that the above are not mutually exclusive

13. International Aquatic and Marine Science Subject Repositories  OceanDocs – using AgriOceanDSpace (customized Dspace)  Aquatic Commons – using Eprints software  CEEMAR – using AgriOceanDSpace – Central & Eastern Europe Can be used as your Institutional Repository or you can host your own organization’s repository Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

14. Marine Science Institutional Repositories  Archimer, Archive Institutionnelle de l'Ifremer,  DRS at National Institute Of Oceanography, Goa  ePrints Soton (National Oceanography Centre, Southampton),  FULIR, Ruder Boskovic Institute  Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas  IRD Documentation, Montpelier  Marine & Ocean Science ePrints Archive @ Plymouth,  MFRDMD@IR (SEAFDEC Institutional Repository)  WHOAS - Woods Hole Open Access Server  Dspace at Mote Marine Laboratory  Calhoun – US Naval Postgraduate School  ScholarsArchive at OSU (Hatfield Marine Science Centre, Oregon)  DO YOU KNOW ANYMORE? Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

15. What challenges would you expect to face when planning the establishment of an institutional repository? QUESTION

16. Challenges  Senior Management Support  Identifying key stakeholders  Cost management  Developing policies  Managing intellectual property rights  Providing for sustainability  Digital preservation Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

17. 3 P s institutional exemplar for the benefits of integration between research systems and a repository People (Relationships) Strong relationships between repository managers and staff at all levels are vital in supporting the deposit of content. Beyond traditional advocacy activities to create active and ongoing partnerships with departments and staff working with the repositories. Workshops, meetings with Heads of Department and addressing departmental meetings. Work with researchers to address their work needs. Processes Include technical and administrative processes needed to join-up the existing elements of the research lifecycle which will facilitate the ease of deposit. Include such things as single sign-on system, a wide range of export and import and data capture options, including DOI and ongoing support for copyright clearance by the Library. The implementation of clear and sustainable workflows Policies In collaboration with Management, other research support sections and researchers to define repository policies acknowledging requirements of the organization and Funders. Discussion: Repository Tools for Managers: Policies

18. Senior Management Support  Demonstrate the case  Talk to influential people, make relationships  Use other institutions as a benchmark – the competitive element  Make the most of drivers – e.g. support for research assessment  Set up a steering group with key people from research, library etc  Formal policies approved by key management committees e.g. Research Committee Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

19. Senior Management Support “We see our Institutional Repository as a key tool for the stewardship of the University's digital research assets,' said Professor Paul Curran, Deputy Vice- Chancellor of the University. 'It will provide greater access to our research, as well as offering a valuable mechanism for reporting and recording it” (2004) Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

20. Repository Steering Group  A well-chosen, well-informed and committed Steering Group can make an important contribution to the sustained success of a repository.  Steering Group to be influential: chaired by a senior member of staff plus:  the Chief Librarian, and relevant Library staff.  Senior computing support staff.  Research Administration staff.  Staff with research assessment responsibilities.  Representation from the Corporate Communications/Marketing department.  Academic researchers from different disciplines (ability to report researchers needs) Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

21. Strategic Objectives of SG  Aligned with those of the parent organization  Overseeing the implementation and operation of the repository.  Policy-making and strategic decision-taking.  Monitoring budgets and staffing resources:  ensuring that necessary resources are committed to the repository, and ensuring that any plans are achievable.  Monitoring progress against plans and agreed objectives; evaluation.  Championing advocacy  Reviewing outcomes and their impact  Regular reporting to parent committees  Securing the long-term sustainability of the repository, ensuring that it is firmly embedded in the strategic thinking of the institution. http://www.rsp.ac.uk/documents/briefing-papers/reposm-steeringgroups.pdf Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

22. Repository Implementation Workplan  Learning about the process by reading about and examining other institutional repositories.  Senior Management Support and Steering Group  Develop a service definition and service plan:  Develop a cost model based on this plan  Create a schedule and timeline  Develop policies that govern maintenance, content acquisition, distribution  Assemble a Repository Team  Conduct a needs assessment within your organization  Choose hardware and install software platform  Marketing and Advocacy  Launching the Repository – choose optimum time  Running the Repository Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

23. Skills, Knowledge & Ability of the Repository Manager  Management  Software  Metadata  Storage and Preservation  Content  Advocacy – training and support  Liaison – internal – wide variety of stakeholders  Liaison – external – promotions of organization; open access and repository interest groups  Current Awareness and Professional Development Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

24. Project Manager Weekly Involvement Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Brad Matthies, 2011

25. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 JISC InfoKit – Repository Manager  A section of the infoKit covers A Management Framework that consists of a range of topics to guide a repository manager through the initial planning process for establishing an institutional repository.  These include the planning approach, making a business case, identifying key stakeholders, the costs and benefits of a repository, risk management, strategic planning and a selection of practical planning tools covering repository staffing and training.  http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/infokits/digital-repositories http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/infokits/digital-repositories

26. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Digital Repositories InfoKit : http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/infokits/digital-repositories/ http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/infokits/digital-repositories/

27. Staffing Repositories Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

28. Background of UK Repository staff (Repository Support Project 2010 Survey) Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 95% first degree 74% post grad qualification

29. Roles Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

30. Skills  Libraries have taken on repositories because of their traditional role of cataloguing and information management. Whilst these are important, they are not top of the list of skills identified by staff in the RSP survey.  Communication is the most dominant skill :  main role of repository staff is to radically alter the process of scholarly communication, with their own interpersonal skills.  Many of the other skills listed such as the delivery of training and presentations and liaison with other departments are linked to this.  Strategic planning, project management and prioritisation were also common themes  Accuracy and attention to detail.  Highlighted the need for perseverance also using terms such as determination, patience and persistence. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

31. Skills Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 WHILST COMMUNICATION SKILLS ARE IMPORTANT – IT SPECIALIST SKILLS ARE ALSO PARAMOUNT

32. Repository Staff Staff requirements vary greatly between institutions depending on the remit of the repository and available resources.  Skills, knowledge and abilities required may be expected of an individual repository post with the assistance of IT personnel ABSOLUTELY essential. However, many institutions In some repositories spread the work over two main posts: 1. Repository Manager- manages the ‘human’ side of the repository including content policies, advocacy, user training and a liaison with a wide range of institutional departments and external contacts. 2. Repository Administrator- manages the technical implementation, customization and management of repository software, manages metadata fields and quality, creates usage reports and tracks the preservation issues.  Other institutions spread the work over several posts or over several departments; typically including library cataloguers, subject librarians, other library, teaching and administrative staff as well as IT services. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

33. Initial Decisions  Resources – Funding – business model - project, or core library budget – Team Technical support is v. important – you will want to customize software (skills – Perl, MySQL for GNU EPrints; Java for DSpace) Strong Advocacy, Admin – Hardware – server – size and growth  Stakeholders/Partnerships – Who owns the activity, who leads? – external liaison, researchers, research support office, library, planning and marketing, Information Systems all involved in parts of research dissemination  Uses - what other services available from IR. Consider: education agenda, e-Publishing, Knowledge Management, Preservation, Research Assessment Exercise, Digital Content Curation

34. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Research Assessment Exercise – special interface requirements

35. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Initial Decisions  Repository/s? – depending on scope will all document types be included in one repository OR separate repositories for different document types or organisational unit?  Southampton built one database for ease of maintenance and upgrade but close collaboration with individual schools to meet their needs  Nottingham has a Theses database separate from its e-Prints database  Glasgow has three separate databases: Published and peer reviewed academic papers, Pre-Prints and Grey Literature and Theses (and uses three different softwares with their own harvester search across all)

36. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Initial Decisions – Software - Essential/ Desirable functionality  Support for OAI-PMH  Simple, web-based deposit form with auto-complete features for some fields  Simple review/editing process  Supports services such as RSS feeds, batch ingest  Interoperability with other systems (eg staff profile pages, Subject repositories, CRIS (Central Research Information System).  Reliable statistics (deposit, downloads etc) generated  Name authority files (for author names and affiliations)  Which software to choose?......

37. Software Approaches : 3 options Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 The DIY Approach Pros – Bespoke solution; total control. Cons – Staff resources; upgrades; long-term maintenance; support. Aids – Fedora components. Observations – Brave choice; not popular Standard Packages to install in-house Pros – Ready-made solution; probably more functionality; regular upgrades; Speedier setup. Cons – No control over improvements; regular upgrades may require re- customisation; Aids – Software suppliers may also offer set-up services. Observations – Most popular approach worldwide; most packages are free External Hosting Pros – Ready-made solution; probably more functionality; regular upgrades; potentially fastest setup; no upgrading issues; minimal staff commitment. Cons – Cost; no control over improvements; security concerns. Aids – Host's staff do everything for you. Observations – Increasing in popularity

38. Skills - IT Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013  Alongside communication the most important member of the repository team is your Software specialist.  Installation and maintenance  Configuring  Branding / web presence  Functionality upgrades  Responding to User Feedback  Technical Documentation

39. Technical Planning Checklist  Have you created a requirements document that sets out the specifications for the system?  Have you compared repository software to find which best fulfils the requirements?  What are the platform requirements for your chosen software? Windows, Linux,Unix etc  Does the internal technical support team have any programming skill requirements?  Have you installed and configured your software?  Have you considered how to integrate your software with other systems within the institution?  What other systems and services might the repository be required to share information with? 'interoperability: OAI,PMH; Web services standards, including Web 2.0, digital library systems and other institutional and personal information systems.  Have you registered your institutional repository with external services to facilitate harvesting?  Have you decided if and how you will collect usage and item download statistics for your repository? Will you use a tool built into your chosen repository, or an external tool or repository add-on?  Have you decided how your institutional repository users will be authenticated?  Have you defined your metadata requirements and set up an appropriate schema?  Have you checked your metadata meets the required standards for interoperability?  Have you considered the workflows within your institutional repository and set up appropriate mechanisms to deal with incoming content?  Is the repository budget sufficient to achieve the technical requirements? Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

40. Badly out of date

41. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Repository Software http://roar.eprints.org/view/software/

42. OceanDocs Network  OceanDocs Central  Become a Community within the Central Repository http://www.oceandocs.org/  OceanDocs Network  Separate repository within the network eg. CEEMAR http://www.ceemar.org/dspace/ ***Marc will be discussing these options this week Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

43. Pilot Repository – essential Advocacy  We will discuss Advocacy in Thursday’s session but an essential tool in your advocacy strategy is to have a demonstrator. Your route: 1.Set up pilot repository 2.Make (preliminary) management decisions 3.Identify stakeholders 4.Environmental audit 5.Identify champions & pilot departments 6.Communication Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

44. Pilot Repository  A pilot repository is essential! - very important for convincing high level decision makers  But just as important is to populate it with good examples - to demonstrate how it works/capabilities - browsing/searching won’t work on an empty repository - different types of deposit (article, conference item, book...) - quality metadata with full text – advertising what can be captured – to motivate deposits - prestigious researchers – national, international – within institution, department, group Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

45. Make (preliminary) Policy Decisions  Aim is to respond rather than dictate – decisions give you a starting point for discussion  Revise policies in response to repository evolution – e.g. research group wants to deposit a type of research output that you hadn’t considered Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

46. Setting up a (Pilot) Repository  Name - don’t use “eprints” or Dspace in the name  Branding - helps staff identify with the IR  Set up capture of access statistics early on - tangible evidence - number of views, number of downloads  Importance of Author IDs - uniquely identify staff members - enables generating CVs, accurate reporting Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

47. Setting up a (Pilot) Repository  e-Print Archive (full text) vs Institutional Repository – (full text or/and Publications Database -- specific media or a record of all organisational output; o Responsibility level of IR – official record, definitive o Decision informed by  Scope – research output? peer-reviewed output?  Type of deposits – include theses, administrative reports?  Who can deposit? – can authors upload work done at other institutions? – can authors edit their own records in archive? Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

48. Setting up a (Pilot) Repository  Copyright  Will you actively seek permission to deposit papers  Preservation guaranteed ?  No definitive answer – projects and Digital Preservation Coalition  ‘secure storage’ – MIT offer preservation as part of their mission.  Assisted deposit – will you offer – what level? must be speedy! – sustainable? – Will you create metadata and deposit full text? Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

49. Setting up a (Pilot) Repository  Digitization  Will you offer to scan hard copy if electronic not available  Figs often only available this way  File formats  What file formats will you accept  Accept all (but…). Formats requiring special viewers – ensure viewers available eg. Postscript/Ghostscript.  Will you accept only pdf  Will you offer file conversion service.  Conversion can alter content format  Word should be converted  Word files - archive only  Native format archived if converted Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

50.  Text  PDF (.pdf)  HTML  ASCII (.txt)  XML  SGML  Images  PDF (.pdf)  Use Type I PostScript fonts  JPEG (.jpg)  CompuServe GIF (.gif)  PNG (.png)  TIFF following version 6.0 or later, including CCITT G4 (.tif)  CGM Computer Graphics Metafile (.cgm)  PhotoCD  Adobe Photoshop (.ppd)  Post Script (.eps)  PowerPoint (.ppt)  Video  MPEG (i.e., MPEG-1, MPEG-2) (.mpg)  QuickTime Apple (.mov)  Audio Video Interleaved Microsoft (.avi)  Streaming video applications  Audio  MPEG-2  MP3  CD-DA  CD-ROM/XA (A or B or C)  AIFF (.aif)  SND (.snd)  Streaming audio applications  WAV (.wav)  MIDI (.midi)  Others  Authoring  Authorware  Director (MMM, PICS)  Special  Spreadsheet Excel (.xcl)  AutoCAD (.dxf), ArcView (GIS)  Reference:  ISBN, ISSN Not Word? What File Formats accepted

51. Setting up a (Pilot) Repository  Metadata quality  Ensuring quality and rich metadata is labour intensive – to what level?  Mandatory metadata fields  Sufficient to produce a citation?  Too many a barrier to deposit – as low as possible - DSpace/MIT = 3, Soton = document dependent Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

52. Setting up a (Pilot) Repository  Deposit Agreement and Use Agreement  Important to define for both depositors and users  Legal document?  Acceptance by click or proceeding through  Withdrawal of records, access etc  Plagiarism  Quality assurance  Not of the content – peer pressure  Appoint editors at department lev el Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

53. Policies  There will be a session devoted to discussion of Policies on Thursday.  Today we have introduced the planning and process. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

54. Be Seen – implement OAI-PMH  OAI-PMH = Open Archives Initiative-Protocol for Metadata http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html “provides an application-independent interoperability framework based on metadata harvesting “  Also see: DRIVER Guidelines for joining the DRIVER network http://www.driver-support.eu/managers.html Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

55. Harvesting European Repositories http://www.driver-repository.eu/

56. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Install your own Harvester System http://pkp.sfu.ca/?q=harvester

57. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013 Harvesting within an Institution or a Network 4 of its own repositories OceanDocs Network Harvester: OceanDocs Central plus all individual repositories within the Network: IBSS, CeeMAR – and all the new ones you will be implementing after this course! **Avano : marine and ocean science harvester – DISCONTINUED!

58. Be Seen – Visible to all Search Engines  Do Not! – Require all visitors to have a username and password – Set a 'robots.txt' file and/or use 'robots' meta tags in HTML headers that prevent search engine crawling – Accept poor quality or restrictive PDF files – Hide your OAI Base URL  Ensure you have a 'Browse' interface with hyperlinks between pages  Avoid awkward URLs - Many harvesters and firewalls will spit out or block: – Numeric URLs - e.g. http://130.226.203.32/ – URLs that use 'https:' instead of 'http:' – URLs that include unusual port numbers e.g. :47231 – Overlong URLs with arguments (any URL containing ‘?’) *http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/documents/ways-to-screw-up.htmlhttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/documents/ways-to-screw-up.html  Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

59. Be Seen - Register your Repository  OpenDOAR - http://www.opendoar.org/suggest.php http://www.opendoar.org/suggest.php  ROAR - http://roar.eprints.org/cgi/register http://roar.eprints.org/cgi/register  DRIVER - http://validator.driver.research-infrastructures.eu/validatorWeb / http://validator.driver.research-infrastructures.eu/validatorWeb /  Openarchives.org - http://www.openarchives.org/Register/BrowseSites http://www.openarchives.org/Register/BrowseSites  Your software community – e.g DSpace instances http://www.dspace.org/whos-using-dspace/Repository-List.htmlhttp://www.dspace.org/whos-using-dspace/Repository-List.html – EP-Tech List  OAIster - http://www.oclc.org/oaister/- http://www.oclc.org/oaister/  BASE - http://www.base-search.net/ http://www.base-search.net/ Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

60. http://repositories.webometrics.info RankingInstituteCountrySizeVisibilityRich Filesscholar 196 Aquatic Commons 78089262567 RankingInstituteCountrySizeVisibilityRich Filesscholar 504OceanDocs422505461785 Size: Total number of web pages by Google (10%) Visibility. Obtained from combining the square root of the external inlinks and the number of their referred webdomains according to the two major providers of link data: Majestic SEOMajestic SEO and ahrefs. The value chosen is the maximum betweenahrefs the normalized products of both (50%). Rich files: The sum of the following file types(by Google): pdf, doc+docx, ppt+pptx and ps+eps (10%) Scholar: The total number of papers in Google Scholar for the 5-year period 2008-2012 (30%).

61. Sources  Repositories Support Project www.rsp.ac.ukwww.rsp.ac.uk  Driver guidelines http://www.driver- support.eu/managers.htmlhttp://www.driver- support.eu/managers.html  Confederation of Open Access Repositories http://www.coar- repositories.org/http://www.coar- repositories.org/  OASIS http://tinyurl.com/68jrpk3http://tinyurl.com/68jrpk3  RCAAP How to create a repository http://tinyurl.com/bpmmgzc http://tinyurl.com/bpmmgzc  Barton, M.R. & Walters, M. 2004 Creating an Institutional Repository: LEADIRS II Workbook. http://www.dspace.org/images/stories/leadirs.pdf http://www.dspace.org/images/stories/leadirs.pdf Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

62. Sources  Acknowledgement of the use of some slide content: JISC, Research Support Project, Jackie Wickham, Bill Hubbard, Brad Matthies,  JISC Digital Repositories InfoKit http://tools.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/downloads/repositories/digital-repositories.pdf http://tools.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/downloads/repositories/digital-repositories.pdf  Giesecke, J. 2011 Institutional repositories: keys to success. Journal of Library Administration, 51, 5-6. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/255 / http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/255 / Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

63. Sustainability: Collective Funding of Repository Infrastructure (Mar 2013) http://www.knowledge-exchange.info/Default.aspx?ID=585

64. Further information on staffing  RSP Repository staff and skills set http://www.rsp.ac.uk/documents/Repository_Staff_and_Skills_Set_2011.pdf  UK Repositories including staffing levels: RSP wiki http://www.rsp.ac.uk/pmwiki/index.php?n=Institutions.HomePage  JISC Recruitment toolkit http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/themes/informationenvironment/recruitment.aspx  Matthies, Brad 2011 Staffing the Repository... http://works.bepress.com/brad_matthies/72/ Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

65. Further information on Software  Repository Software Survey, Repository Support Project, March 2009 http://www.rsp.ac.uk/software/Repository-Software-Survey-2009-03.pdf http://www.rsp.ac.uk/software/Repository-Software-Survey-2009-03.pdf  Evaluation of Digital Repository Software at the National Library of Medicine, Jennifer L. Marill and Edward C. Luczak, May/June 2009, D-Lib Magazine, Volume 15 Number 5/6 http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may09/marill/05marill.html http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may09/marill/05marill.html  Digital Collections Risk Assessment at LSE: Using DRAMBORA http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/keepit/2010/07/19/digital-collections-risk-assessment-at-lse-using- drambora/ http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/keepit/2010/07/19/digital-collections-risk-assessment-at-lse-using- drambora/  A Guide to Institutional Repository Software,, Open Society Institute, August 2004, 3rd Edition http://www.soros.org/openaccess/pdf/OSI_Guide_to_IR_Software_v3.pdf http://www.soros.org/openaccess/pdf/OSI_Guide_to_IR_Software_v3.pdf  Requirements Specification, University of York Digital Library Project (SAFIR), Version 1.1, March 2008. https://vle.york.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/xid-89716_3https://vle.york.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/xid-89716_3  Wellcome Library requirements for a digital object repository, 2008 http://library.wellcome.ac.uk/assets/wtx055600.doc http://library.wellcome.ac.uk/assets/wtx055600.doc  Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS), Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS), CCSDS 650.0-B-1, Blue Book, January 2002 http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

66. Learning Outcome At the end of this session you will be able to: Understand the different types of repositories for appropriate purposes; plan the implementation of a repository knowing the issues that must be addressed and the options to allow you to make decisions. Development & Management of e-Repositories 2013

67. OceanTeacher Academy