1. Test plan for CLIC MB linac quad LAPP option A.Jeremie

2. Things needed to be studied for nm stabilisation Instrumentation: – nm, low frequency, compact, rad hard, insensitive to magnetic field Mechanics=> design and dynamic calculations – Maximise rigidity, Minimise weight, Minimise beam height, Optimise support positions Stabilization strategy – automatics, active or passive isolation, feedback etc… A.Jeremie2

3. Instrumentation A.Jeremie3

4. A.Jeremie, 1st EuCARD Annual Meeting, April 2010 4 Sensors that can measure nanometres Absolute velocity/acceleration studied at LAPP: Relative displacement/velocity: Capacitive gauges :Best resolution 10 pm (PI), 0 Hz to several kHz Linear encoders best resolution 1 nm (Heidenhain) Vibrometers (Polytec) ~1nm at 15 Hz Interferometers (SIOS, Renishaw, Attocube) <1 nm at 1 Hz OXFORD MONALISA (laser interferometry) Optical distance meters Compact Straightness Monitors (target 1 nm at 1 Hz) Sub-nanometre measurements CERN test bench : membrane and interferometer ATF2 vibration and vacuum test  Validation  Next: optical test

5. Güralp CMG-40T Sensor type: electromagnetic geophone broadband Signal: velocity x,y,z Sensitivity: 1600V/m/s Frequency range: 0,033-50Hz Mass: 7,5kg Radiation: Feedback loop so no Magnetic field: no Feedback loop First resonance 440Hz Temperature sensitivity: 0,6V/10°C Electronic noise measured at >5Hz: 0,05nm Stable calibration A.Jeremie5

6. Endevco 86 Sensor type: piezoelectric accelerometer Signal: acceleration z Sensitivity: 10V/g Frequency range: 0,01-100Hz but useful from 7Hz Mass: 771g Radiation: piezo OK, but resin? Magnetic field: probably OK but acoustic vibrations? Feedback loop First resonance 370Hz Temperature sensitivity: <1% Electronic noise measured at >5Hz: 0,25nm, >50Hz 0,02nm Stable calibration, flat response Doesn’t like shocks A.Jeremie6

7. SP500 Sensor type: electrochemical, special electrolyte Signal: velocity Sensitivity: 20000V/m/s Frequency range: 0,016-75Hz Mass: 750g Radiation: no effect around BaBar (don’t know exact conditions) Magnetic field: tested in 1T magnet => same coherence, amplitude? Feedback loop First resonance >200Hz Electronic noise measured at >5Hz: 0,05nm Unstable calibration, response not flat Robust A.Jeremie7

8. Mechanics A.Jeremie8

9. 9 Option CERN: Rigid support and active vibration control Approach: PARALLEL structure with inclined actuator legs with integrated length measurement (<1nm resolution) and flexural joints Concept drawing 3 d.o.f. : Up to 6 d.o.f. actuators sensors Soft elastomere joint in between Option LAPP: Soft support (joint more for guidance than really « soft ») and active vibration control Rigid: less sensitive to external forces but less broadband damping

10. A.Jeremie, 1st EuCARD Annuel Meeting, April 2010 10 And adding active isolation rms S. Redaelli, CERN 2004 Approach: « Replace » TMC table by a more compact device LAPP option Until now, the isolation function was studied on a TMC commercial active table: almost CLIC specifications but too big! (2.4mx0.9mx0.6m)

11. 11 Status: Construction + tests on elastomer

12. 12 Test program at LAPP: Tests on a sensor borrowed from micro-epsilon (CS601-0.05) on a dedicated test set-up. Has been sent back  Results show that a nanometre movement can be measured by the sensor according to sensor specs. Bought a sensor from PI (D-015): Results show it responds according to specs. We will try it this week on the isolation device :if it really fits the pieces and if it can measure the displacements. Then if OK, we will buy 3 more: receive around July- August. Then tests on isolation device can start. Study elastomere : shape (recent tests are difficult to interpret, need a better study and fabrication process: unique piece vs separate rings), and do we need extra passive material Type 4 pole measurement with extended DAQ system (arrived a few weeks ago) for modal analysis

13. A.Jeremie13 2) Steel QUADRANT Procurement STATUS: 2a) Production at Ostroj(1 LONG test quadrant) Machining COMPLETED Quadrant under final measurement(the 2nd). Is now at CERN were it will be measured and then sent to LAPP for test(vibration modes etc.) NOTE: Ostrojis commissioning the new fine grinding machine. At beginning of the summer (June, to be negotiated with CERN, LAPP and Ostroj) it is expected to send back the quadrant for final micrometric grinding. MB linac quad status (information from Michele Modena) We will do the modal measurements on Type 4 quadrant since we are confident that our mechanical model describes well the quadrant => see results on our Al prototype (next slide)

14. A.Jeremie14

15. A.Jeremie15

16. A.Jeremie16 Tentative program

17. Conclusions 17A.Jeremie Stabilisation is in R&D phase still doing the feasibility demonstration. Study both options and eventually choose one, or take the best of each (after tests). We still don’t have the “perfect” sensor yet. Probably need to go further and start R&D with manufacturers. But no device isolates perfectly and only by a given factor (x2 to x30): need a quiet background to stabilise to tolerances demanded for CLIC=> impact on the whole CLIC design (support, module, tunnel etc…