Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

WAVELET NOISE REMOVAL FROM BASEBAND DIGITAL SIGNALS IN BANDLIMITED CHANNELS Dr. Robert Barsanti SSST March 2010, University of Texas At Tyler.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "WAVELET NOISE REMOVAL FROM BASEBAND DIGITAL SIGNALS IN BANDLIMITED CHANNELS Dr. Robert Barsanti SSST March 2010, University of Texas At Tyler."— Presentation transcript:

1 WAVELET NOISE REMOVAL FROM BASEBAND DIGITAL SIGNALS IN BANDLIMITED CHANNELS Dr. Robert Barsanti SSST March 2010, University of Texas At Tyler

2 Overview Introduction Baseband Digital Signals Wavelet Domain Filtering Matched Filtering Wavelet Coefficients Simulations and Results Summary

3 Baseband Digital Signals The simplest digital baseband systems transmit binary data made up of pulses. These Pulse Amplitude Modulated (PAM) signals can be represented as Pulse Amplitude Modulator Transmit Filter g(t) Digital Input Data a k s(t) The symbol ‘a’ represents the signal amplitude, and T is the bit duration. Block diagram of PAM signal generation [6].

4 Baseband Digital Signals The power spectrum of the PAM signal is Where the power spectrum of the uncorrelated symbols is given by, and G(f) is the spectrum of the pulse g(t)

5 Baseband Digital Signals Decision Device Receive Filter h(t) Channel c(t) s(t) + n(t ) Sample t = T anan r(t ) y(nT ) Block diagram of PAM signal reception [6]. x(t) Transmitted symbol Filtered Noise ISI

6 Raised Cosine Pulse Shape This figure shows an example of a raised cosine pulse used to combat ISI.

7 Antipodal Signal Probability of Bit Error Assuming the received signal at the input to the correlator is corrupted with Gaussian noise of zero mean and variance No/2. The probability of bit error can be computed to be [5] It can be seen that the probability does not depend on the detailed signal and noise characteristics, but only upon the signal to noise ratio per bit (SNR) [6].

8 The Classical Cross Correlation Receiver for two transmitted signals Detector ( choose largest ) So S1 Sample at t = T riri X X Output Symbol

9 Time Domain Matched Filter Receiver for two transmitted signals Detector ( choose largest ) riri Output Symbol Receive Filter h 1 (t) Receive Filter h 2 (t)

10 Noise Removal Separate the signal from the noise TRANSFORMATION Noisy Signal Signal Noise

11 Wavelet Filtering

12 Wavelet Based Filtering THREE STEP DENOISING 1. PERFORM DWT 2. THRESHOLD COEFFICIENTS 3. PERFORM INVERSE DWT

13 Wavelet Filtering of a PAM Signal DWT of a noise free PAM signal.DWT of noisy PAM signal.

14 Wavelet Domain Filtering (1)transform prototype signal into the wavelet domain and pre-stored DWT coefficients (2)transform received signal into the wavelet domain via the DWT, (3)apply a non-linear threshold to the DWT coefficients (to remove noise), (4)correlate the noise free DWT coefficients of the signal, and the pre-stored DWT coefficients of the prototype signal.

15 Wavelet Domain Correlation Receiver Output Symbol Detector ( choose largest ) So S1 r i Bank of Cross- Correlation Receivers Wavelet De-noise DWT

16 Wavelet Domain Matched Filter Receiver DWTWavelet De-noise Wavelet Receive Filter h(k) r(t) y(Nk ) Decision Device w’(k) w(t) Output Symbol

17 Simulation Pulse signals were generated using 256 samples per symbol Monte Carlo Runs at each SNR with different instance of AWGN 10 SNR’s between -6 and +10 dB Symmlet 8 wavelet & hard threshold Threshold set to σ/2. Only 64 coefficients retained

18 Bit Error Rate Curve for PAM

19 Results (1)Both the WD and classical TD receivers provided similar results. (2) The WDC provides improvement in processing speed since only 64 vice 256 coefficients were used in the correlations.

20 Summary (1)Receiver for PAM signals in the presence of AWGN. (2) Uses the matched filtering of DWT coefficients (3)Procedure is enhanced by using standard wavelet noise removal techniques (4)Simulations of the performance of the proposed algorithm were presented.

21

22

23 Wavelets 1. Can be defined by a wavelet function (Morlet & Mexican hat) 2. Can be defined by an FIR Filter Function (Haar, D4, S8) 00.20.40.60.81 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Some S8 Symmlets at Various Scales and Locations time index k Scale j

24 EFFECTIVENESS OF WAVELET ANALYSIS Wavelets are adjustable and adaptable by virtue of large number of possible wavelet bases. DWT well suited to digital implementation. ~O (N) Ideally suited for analysis non-stationary signals [ Strang, 1996] Has been shown to be a viable denoising technique for transients [Donoho, 1995] Has been shown to be a viable detection technique for transients [Carter, 1994] Has been shown to be a viable TDOA technique for transients [Wu, 1997]

25 Wavelet Implementation HP Filter LP Filter X(n) LPF HPF Frequency Response F/2 Pair of Half Band Quadrature Mirror Filters (QMF) [Vetterli, 1995] Details Averages

26 Signal Reconstruction Two Channel Perfect Reconstruction QMF Bank Analysis + Synthesis = LTI system

27 Wavelet Implementation [Mallat, 1989] LP 2 2 2 HP 2 2 2 LPLPLP J = 4 LPLPHP J = 3 LPHP J = 2 HP J = 1 HP LPHP LPLPHP LPLPLP 2 J samples LP

28 Symmlet Wavelet vs. Time and Frequency

29 Calculating a Threshold Let the DWT coefficient be a series of noisy observations y(n) then the following parameter estimation problem exists: y(n) = f(n) + s z(n), n = 1,2,…. z ~N(0,1) and  = noise std.  is estimated from the data by analysis of the coefficients at the lowest scale.  = E/0.6475 where E is the absolute median deviation [Kenny]

30 Thresholding Techniques * Hard Thresholding (keep or kill) * Soft Thresholding (reduce all by Threshold) The Threshold Value is determined as a multiple of the noise standard deviation, eg., T = m  where typically 2< m <5

31 Hard vs. Soft Thresholds


Download ppt "WAVELET NOISE REMOVAL FROM BASEBAND DIGITAL SIGNALS IN BANDLIMITED CHANNELS Dr. Robert Barsanti SSST March 2010, University of Texas At Tyler."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google