Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Clinical Implications from Rear Impact Investigations of a Wheelchair & Occupant Presenter: John Tiernan CEng 1 Co-Authors: Jennifer Walsh 2, Ciaran Simms.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Clinical Implications from Rear Impact Investigations of a Wheelchair & Occupant Presenter: John Tiernan CEng 1 Co-Authors: Jennifer Walsh 2, Ciaran Simms."— Presentation transcript:

1 Clinical Implications from Rear Impact Investigations of a Wheelchair & Occupant Presenter: John Tiernan CEng 1 Co-Authors: Jennifer Walsh 2, Ciaran Simms 2, David FitzPatrick 3 Affiliations: 1. SeatTech, Enable Ireland 2. Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin 3. School of Electrical, Electronic & Mechanical Engineering, University College Dublin

2 Research Background Current recommended safety level – Wheelchair Tie-down and Occupant Restraint System (WTORS) Current recommended safety level – Wheelchair Tie-down and Occupant Restraint System (WTORS) Main area of research - Frontal impact Main area of research - Frontal impact Use of sled tests and numerical modelling has proven successful Use of sled tests and numerical modelling has proven successful Focus is on occupant retention Focus is on occupant retention 50 th percentile crash test dummy 50 th percentile crash test dummy ISO surrogate wheelchair ISO surrogate wheelchair

3 Representative Models - Occupant Large variation among wheelchair occupants Large variation among wheelchair occupants Gender, age, height and weight influence the risk of injury (Temming et al 1 ) Gender, age, height and weight influence the risk of injury (Temming et al 1 ) Current injury criteria based on general population; Level of risk associated with disabled population may be higher (Bertocci et al 2 ) Current injury criteria based on general population; Level of risk associated with disabled population may be higher (Bertocci et al 2 ) 1.Temming, J., Zobel, R. (1998) IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Goteborg. 2.Bertocci, G. et al. (2000). IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8(1): 126-39.

4 Representative Models - Wheelchair Large Variety Large Variety Custom modifications to crash tested (ISO 7176- 19) wheelchairs may nullify certification Custom modifications to crash tested (ISO 7176- 19) wheelchairs may nullify certification Destructive testing unfeasible thus effect of alterations largely unknown Destructive testing unfeasible thus effect of alterations largely unknown Adapted Wheelchairs ISO Surrogate Wheelchair

5 Objectives of this Research… To investigate the effect of: Rear Impact on an occupant and wheelchair during surface transport Rear Impact on an occupant and wheelchair during surface transport Scoliosis in such an event Scoliosis in such an event Adaptations to seating support surfaces Adaptations to seating support surfaces on the predicted risk of injury

6 Methods 1.Sled testing of: BioRID II occupant, and BioRID II occupant, and Surrogate Wheelchair Surrogate Wheelchair to provide validation data 2.Create and Validate a baseline Computational Model for Rear Impact 3.Used Model as an Analysis tool to investigate the effect of Seating Alterations

7 Crash Test (Thatcham)  IIWPG 10g rear impact  BioRID II  ISO surrogate wheelchair  WTORS

8 Validated Numerical Baseline Model X Z  MADYMO

9 Scoliosis Lateral Frontal

10 Scoliosis – Cobb Angle Mild Moderate Severe Frontal Lateral

11 Baseline Vs. Scoliosis Models Baseline Mild Scoliosis Moderate Scoliosis Severe Scoliosis

12 Altered Kinematics

13

14 Point Loading Baseline Mild Scoliosis Moderate Scoliosis

15 Forces on Spine Peak force of 2.3kN in Thoracic region of Severe Scoliosis case approaches value that is known to damage Lumbar vertebrae, 2.8kN 5 5. Begeman P. et al, SAE Technical Report 942205, 1994.

16 Apex of the Curve Largest Force at the Apex of the deformed spine, caused by: Largest Force at the Apex of the deformed spine, caused by: Largest deformity Largest deformity Effect of point loading Effect of point loading In this area there is an associated In this area there is an associated Rib hump Rib hump Respiratory problems 6 Respiratory problems 6 6. Closkey R. et al, Journal of Orthopedic Research, 11(5):730-7, 1993.

17 Postural Supports www.wheelchairnet.orgEnable Ireland

18 Addition of Postural Supports - using Planes

19 Addition of Cushioned Postural Supports Baseline wheelchair Adapted Wheelchair  Similar peak values of joint constraint force for moderate case of scoliosis in baseline & adapted wheelchair  Loading pattern is altered in adapted wheelchair, with large ramping up of forces

20 Bottoming out of cushion on the surface of postural supports

21 Addition of Rigid Postural Supports Baseline wheelchair Adapted Wheelchair  Peak values of force reduced  Effects of scoliosis are greatly reduced  Point loading is reduced due to larger contact area

22 Clinical Implications Scoliotic occupant found to be at greater risk of injury Scoliotic occupant found to be at greater risk of injury Seating adapted to fit the contours of an occupant provides an increased level of protection Seating adapted to fit the contours of an occupant provides an increased level of protection Cushioning Material must be taken into account as the forces associated with a crash can lead to compression of a cushioning material & subsequent contact made with the harder surface beneath Cushioning Material must be taken into account as the forces associated with a crash can lead to compression of a cushioning material & subsequent contact made with the harder surface beneath

23 Acknowledgements


Download ppt "Clinical Implications from Rear Impact Investigations of a Wheelchair & Occupant Presenter: John Tiernan CEng 1 Co-Authors: Jennifer Walsh 2, Ciaran Simms."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google