1. SB2009 Triage 20091215A1 SB2009 Triage Summary 20091215A N.Toge

2. Cover Is the author list OK? SB2009 Triage 20091215A2

3. Sec 1. Intro Think it is OK SB2009 Triage 20091215A3

4. Sec 2. Overview Contents mostly done. Still need to fix Fig 2.1(Right); where is the number to use there? Check Table 2.1 and Table 2.2. Give some kind of a better pointer to Appendix A Availability. SB2009 Triage 20091215A4

5. Sec. 3 Layout Contents mostly done. One more final check, please, anyone. SB2009 Triage 20091215A5

6. Sec 4.1. SRF Contents mostly done. One more final check, please, anyone. SB2009 Triage 20091215A6

7. Sec 4.2. Electron Source Contents mostly done. One more final check, please, anyone. SB2009 Triage 20091215A7

8. Sec 4.3. Positron Source Previously we said: –Quote the ref for Kubo‘s work (presented at Alburquerque) on the ML operability issue of alternate pulsing at low Ecm operation (Jim C). STATUS?  supposedly covered by 4.6.4. Need to confirm. –Mention that propagation of the beam emittance thru the undulator (besides energy spread) is a continued topic into TDP2 (Jim C).  Are we giving it up? –Reconcile the BDS Beamlie figure and Posi Conceptual Diagram  Deepa, JimC, Toge, ++ DISCUSSION DONE –Somehow import the animation (or sth equivalent) of the alternate pulsing,Also import the highlighted diagram for the aux source.  NKT … THIS IS STILL PENDING  Giving it up; No time + laziness Fig numbers required fixes. Attention! One more final check, please, anyone. SB2009 Triage 20091215A8

9. Sec 4.4. DRs Think we are done. SB2009 Triage 20091215A9

10. Sec 4.5. RTMLs Think we are done. SB2009 Triage 20091215A10

11. Sec 4.6. ML KCS considered done. DRFS considered done. Need to check 4.6.4 (new sub sec)  MCR SB2009 Triage 20091215A11

12. Sec 4.7. BDS Contents mostly done. We said previously, –Label the "matching section" in Fig 4.7.1 (Deepa). Clean up the text to go with that Fig (NKT).  Done, as of 20091203A –In consideration of the low Ecm operation with alternate ML pulsing, introduce one more beamline on the electron side to deal with high/low energy beams to do doglegs downstream of the undulator.  do this with word, not with fig. –(Partial) response from the GDE Physics Question Comm: --> tomorrow, following the report by BF, who indicates everything the “stability“ issue are reasonably answerable. Expect circulation of his preview later today/tonight.  Shall we forget this? … being handled in Sec 2 by NJW –Part of the BDS line has to accommodate three / four beamlines. Extract corresponding tunnel cross-section views from CF/S drawing set and stick it into the Layout section (NKT). BDS will ref to it.  JMP (text!!!) + NKT (illustration) /MCR … done in Sec 3 –PMs have to determine how much spotlight we would give on the travelling forusing. One more final check, please, anyone. SB2009 Triage 20091215A12

13. SB2009 Triage 20091215A13 Sec 4.8. CFS Safety study materials - quote the uris for existing work reports, add a short paragraph. No separate appendix (Vic K). –The stuff now in EDMS but not yet accessible via EDMS-DIRECT … Still need to fix ML lengths in the illustrations – additional length for undulator energy loss –additional length for QWT energy loss –additional length for bunch timing matching (416m which was missing in RDR). PMs to create lines to this effect, we quote this same text in the Layout and CFS sections. Otherwise, Contents mostly done. One more final check, please, anyone.

14. SB2009 Triage 20091215A14 Sec. 5. Cost Complete the manuscript  WIP PHG Implement part of the Cost summary in the Overview  PMs Where are we at this point?

15. SB2009 Triage 20091215A15 Sec. 6. Risk Somewhat MIA

16. SB2009 Triage 20091215A16 Appendix. Availability We take whatever we have at the last moment?