Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Student Growth and Performance Update: A Comparison of RttT & Non-RttT Ohio Public School Districts An Overview of Local LEA Data: Nordonia Hills City.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Student Growth and Performance Update: A Comparison of RttT & Non-RttT Ohio Public School Districts An Overview of Local LEA Data: Nordonia Hills City."— Presentation transcript:

1 Student Growth and Performance Update: A Comparison of RttT & Non-RttT Ohio Public School Districts An Overview of Local LEA Data: Nordonia Hills City Schools NE Region Winter 2013

2 Ohio RttT/Non-RttT Cohorts # OHIO Students RttTNon- RttT Public Districts610285325 Enrollment1,637,29955%45% Poverty704, 20962%38% Minority332,38877%23% Minority (excludes large urban districts) 200,12262%38% Student with Disabilities (SWD)218,49759%41%

3 District Demographics Type 5 (Suburban – low student poverty and average student population) 3,720 Enrollment $42,752 Median Income 17% Poverty 21.2% Minority population 10.2% Students with Disabilities

4 Performance Index Gain of 2.4 RttT & Non-RttT Districts (3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

5 District Performance Index Gain/Loss Three-year Average before RttT (08-10 LRC) 100.17 Performance Index 2012-2013 LRC 104.5 Gain/Loss + 4.33 gain

6 RttT, Non-RttT & District Performance Index Gain (3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

7 Value Added Growth A = 2 or more year’s growth B = 1 year of growth, but less than 2 C = Greater or equal to -1 but less than +1 D = Greater or equal to -2 but less than -1 F = Less than -2 Overall Gifted Students With Disabilities Lowest 20%

8 Percent of RttT vs Non-RttT Districts Adding More than 1 Year’s Growth

9 Gifted Value Added (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years) Percent of districts Adding More than 1 year's Growth

10 SWD Value Added (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years) Percent of districts adding more than 1 year's growth (2012-2013 LRC)

11 Value Added - Lowest 20% (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years) Percent of districts adding more than 1 year's growth 2012-2013 LRC

12 Value Added Growth –District A = 2 or more year’s growth B = 1 year of growth, but less than 2 C = Greater or equal to -1 but less than +1 D = Greater or equal to -2 but less than -1 F = Less than -2 A - Overall C - Gifted A - Students With Disabilities A - Lowest 20%

13 District Performance compared to All Ohio Districts Letter Grade All OH 610 Districts Overall Percent of Districts Gifted Percent of Districts SWD Percent of Districts Lowest 20% Percent of Districts A46101614 B8121716 C14454249 D8161012 F238136 NR822

14 RttT/Non-RttT 3 rd Grade Reading % at or above Proficient ( 3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

15 District - 3 rd Grade Reading 87.7% Three-year average before RttT Percent at or above Proficient 93.7% 2012-13 LRC + 6.0% Gain

16 3 rd Grade Reading % at or above Proficient ( 3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

17 RttT/Non-RttT 4-Year Average Graduation Rate

18 District Graduation Rate (4 Year) 2010 Rate 94.7% (“On-time”) 2012 Rate 94.7% (4-Year Longitudinal) Gain or Loss: - 0.1%

19 RttT, Non-RttT & District Graduation Rates


Download ppt "Student Growth and Performance Update: A Comparison of RttT & Non-RttT Ohio Public School Districts An Overview of Local LEA Data: Nordonia Hills City."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google