Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson IEEE 802.11 TGg Chairs Status Update Matthew B. Shoemake TGg Chairperson.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson IEEE 802.11 TGg Chairs Status Update Matthew B. Shoemake TGg Chairperson."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson IEEE 802.11 TGg Chairs Status Update Matthew B. Shoemake TGg Chairperson m.b.shoemake@ieee.org November 11, 2002

2 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson Objective of a Study Group From the LMSC Operating Rules: –The Study Group shall have a defined task with specific output and a specific time frame established within which they are allowed to study the subject. It is expected that the work effort to develop a PAR will originate in a ECSG or WGSG. A Study Group shall report its recommendations, shall have a limited lifetime, and is chartered meeting-to- meeting. After the Study Group recommendation(s) has been accepted by the parent body, the Study Group will be disbanded no later than the end of the next Plenary Session.

3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson Objective of an 802 Task Group From Overview and Guide to 802 LMSC –Each project approved within an existing group is assigned a letter, for example 802.1D for MAC Bridges in the High Level Interface WG. A Study Group (SG) is formed when a new area is first investigated for standardization. The SG can be within an existing WG or TAG, or it can be independent of the WGs. A new project in an existing group is developed by a Task Force [Group], while a new independent project creates a new WG.

4 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson Objectives of an 802 Task Group (2) From 802.11 WG Operating Rules –The function of the Task Group is to produce a draft standard, recommended practice, guideline, supplement, or portion of a draft standard to the WG. These shall be within the scope of the P802 LMSC, the charter of the WG and under an approved PAR as established by the P802 LMSC EC and approved by the IEEE Standards Board. After the publication by the IEEE of the standard, recommended practice or guideline, the function of the TG is complete and its charter expires (see section 3.5).

5 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson History – HRb SG, March 2000 Session IEEE 802.11 Working Group passed motion to form Study Group to investigate extension to 802.11b Excerpts from document 00-057-r1: –Motion: 00/61P27 (198) To authorize an IEEE 802.11 Study Group to investigate technical extensions that are interoperable with 802.11b and that can lead to higher than 20Mbps data rates and other performance improvements to the existing 802.11b standard. The group shall present any candidate PARs to 802.11 in time for those PARs that are approved to appear on the November 00 SEC agenda. –Moved: John Faketselis Second: Chris Heegard Motion Passes 30/0/0 –Motion: 00/61P28 (199) To give the assembly at the May 2000 conference authorization to pre-submit the PAR(s) of the just established Study Group (SG2.4GHz) to the July SEC meeting. –Moved: Denis Kuwahara Second: John Kowalski Motion Passes 28/0/0 –Matthew Shoemake was nominated as Chair of Study Group (SG-2.4GHz). No other nominations. Approved by acclamation.

6 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson History – HRb SG, May 2000 Session Excerpts document 00-116-r1, 802.11 WG Minutes: –Wednesday 802.11 High Rate B Study Group Report – Matthew Shoemake 2.5.4.1. First meeting this week 2.5.4.2. Nine papers presented 2.5.4.3. Work has been done on writing Draft PAR and Five Criteria. 2.5.4.4. Remaining issues on interoperability and coexistence. 2.5.4.5. Potential for acceptance of PAR and Five Criteria this week. –Friday 3.7.6.3. Move to accept the PAR and Five Criteria, documents 00/114r2 and 00/115r3 respectively, and forward the PAR and 5 Criteria to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee for approval. 3.7.6.3.2. Moved Matthew Shoemake/Carl Andren 3.7.6.3.5. Vote: Motion Passes 14:0:1 3.7.6.4. Move to empower the HRb SG to continue work through the period of the July Plenary. 3.7.6.4.2. Moved Peter Eccelsine/Harry Worstell 3.7.6.4.5. Vote: Motion Passes 17:0:0

7 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson History – TGg, July 2000 Session From document 00-246 –On Wednesday July 12 th –3.2 Discussion of Key Group Requirements of Selection Process (Doc. 209) –3.2.2 Mark Webster would like to have the ability to merge two proposals. Document will be rewritten to address the possibility of having two proposals merging. –3.2.3 No vote was taken. Requirements of Selection Process will be put up for vote with TGg. From document 00-246 –On Thursday July 13 th –4.2.2 Selection Process i. No issues with document. Will be submitted to server as (Doc. 209r1)

8 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson History – July, August & September 2000 July, August and September Conference Calls –Held a series of four conference calls to work on Functional Requirements and Comparison Criteria September 2000 Session –Officially become Task Group G as our PAR is approved –Adopted an official Selection Procedure 00/209r3 –Adopted official Functional Requirements 00/210 –Adopted official Comparison Criterion 00/211

9 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson History – November & January 2001 November 2000 Session –At the November 2000 session one of the four submitted proposals was eliminated under the low hurdle round of the Selection Procedure, namely the DQPSK proposal –There were three proposals remaining at that time. January 2001 Session –Discussions with FCC –Presentation of documents –No votes taken on proposals

10 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson History – March & May 2001 March 2001 Session –At the March 2000 Session one of three remaining proposals was eliminated, namely the MBCK proposal (Results in Doc. 11-01-108r0.) May 2001 Session –At may meeting an additional round of voting was conducted under Selection Procedure Step 19. In this round of voting, CCK-OFDM received 58% and PBCC received 42%, thereby eliminating PBCC under Step 19. –Second vote was schedule to vote on CCK-OFDM under Step 19. –Technical selection procedure interpretation was called into question resulting in no vote being taken. –After some debate, the session was adjourned before the end of its scheduled time allocation. –WG passed a resolution directing TGg to hold fair and open debate on the meaning of Selection Procedure Step 19

11 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson IEEE 802.11g Objectives July 2001 Session Conducted fair debate on the interpretation of Selection Procedure (00/209r3) Step 19 Result: The next round of voting, and subsequent rounds of voting, under Step 19 of the TGg Selection Procedure are used to determine support for the remaining proposal. Voters shall be allowed the following options on the ballot to select the remaining proposal: a.) “For Proposal” --- indicating support for the proposal in its then current form b.) “Reject Proposal” --- indicating that the proposal is not acceptable in its current form c.) “Abstain” --- indicating a non-vote The level of support is based on the total of “For Proposal” and “Against Proposal” votes, and does not include “Abstain” votes. Until a level of 75% has been attained for the final proposal - indicating its formal selection - between ballots, the team making the remaining proposal will be allowed to modify that proposal. Should the remaining proposal fail to attain 33 1/3% support on any vote, the rounds of voting will terminate, the selection procedure will have been completed, the remaining proposal will be eliminated, and the body will then determine what happens next.

12 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson IEEE 802.11g Objectives September 2001 Session Cancelled

13 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson November 2001 Session Enabled first draft of the IEEE 802.11g, namely draft 1.0 Selected editor of 802.11g, Carl Andren Between November 2001 and January 2002 session, draft was updated with editorial changes to draft 1.1

14 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson January 2002 Session Presentation of general submissions Presentation related to the draft standard Motions related to the draft standard Coordination with Radio Regulatory Issued first IEEE 802.11g Letter Ballot (LB#33)

15 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson March 2002 Session Resolved comments from LB#33 Broken comments up into five categories: –Editorial, General, Clause 19, Clauses 19.5 and 19.6, Non-clause 19 and participants Tracking resolution of comments in document 11-02-209 Resolved about half of the comments at March 2002 session

16 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson May 2002 Session Resolved comments from LB#33 At end of May 2002 Session, current version of comment resolution document is 11-02-209r10 Approx. 100 comments related to clauses 19.5 and 19.6 remain to be resolved

17 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson July 2002 Strategy Completed resolution of comments from Letter Ballot #33 Generated draft 3.0 Issued new IEEE 802.11g Letter Ballot (Letter Ballot #41)

18 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson Letter Ballot #41 Results Ballot closed on September 1, 2002 Unofficial results: –YES : 184 –NO: 45 –Abstain: 30 –YES Percentage: 80.35% 11-02-522r0: Letter Ballot 41 Results 11-02-534r0: Letter Ballot 41 Comments –Approximately 605 comments 320 Technical 285 Editorial

19 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson September 2002 Completed resolution of Letter Ballot #41 comments Comment resolutions in docume 11-02-535 After session, Letter Ballot #45 was issued to approve the issuance of a new recirculation. This ballot passed. Subsequently Letter Ballot #49 was issued as a recirculation on Draft 4.0 of 802.11g.

20 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson November 2002 Goals: –Review Recirculation Ballot results (Letter Ballot #49) –Resolve comments and issue new recirculation ballot or forward to Sponsor Ballot –Joint meeting with 802.18 Approach: –Review comments in doc. 11-02-xxx –Make decision on approach, i.e. Sponsor Ballot or Recirculation Ballot

21 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson Announcements No logos or copyrighted information on submissions Please turn off mobile phones (or put them on vibrate mode) while in the meeting Use the standard MS Word and Powerpoint templates for official submissions

22 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson Announcements (2) There is an 802.11b-based wireless LAN set up for use by members The SSID for the WLAN is IEEE There is a DHCP server on the network The network is connected to the internet via a T1 line All IEEE 802.11 documents may be downloaded from the server, 10.0.0.1 Documents may be submitted on 10.0.0.1 by placing them in the directory To_Doc_Keeper The server 10.0.0.1 may be access via MS Networking or via HTTP


Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02-704r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson IEEE 802.11 TGg Chairs Status Update Matthew B. Shoemake TGg Chairperson."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google