1. THEORY OF INTERIOR DESIGN THE CLASSICAL THEORY

2. It is understood that we all have a different perception as to what constitutes beautiful architecture. However, there is something so universally attractive and honest about the classical theory; the mathematics, precision and calculations that go into achieving a precise and faultless art form.

3. The classical simplicity and its dominant stance we have become so familiar with over the centuries has dominated the architectural ideal of perfection. Based on the works of Vitruvius, Palladio, and Laugier we are able to recognize the brilliance behind the style and its relation to human and nature.

4. Vitruvius gives an underlying definition as to what constitutes the appropriate formula of the classical theory. His writing in the Ten Books of Architecture is our equivalent to a how-to-guide for building and constructing perfectly proportioned classical architecture. He gives a detailed explanation based on the principles of symmetry, harmony and order, bounded by its relation to the human body and nature.

5. He lays out the fundamentals of building in a systematic approach to planning, constructing, and applied ornamentation. In particular, the orders of columns such as Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian, defining the details needed to attain the highest level of harmony.

6. Palladio bases his writings on the wisdoms of Vitruvius. The Four Books of Architecture reinforce principles of classical design through detailed guidelines and illustrations. This model has been adopted in design for many centuries, providing us with organization and uniformity for geometry, balance, and proportion. It is through classical design that we have developed our simple need for shelter into a sophisticated dwelling for man.

7. The question is how relevant is the factor of perfection and mathematic symmetry in our need for shelter? Laugier explores the basics of construction and how we have become so distracted by the adornment of architecture that is masques the beauty behind it; we forget to appreciate the basics. He reverts back to Ancient Greece and the three essential parts of architecture: the column, the entablature, and the pediment.

8. He refers to the “Primitive Hut” and describes our need for pure and honest architecture. The hut becomes a metaphor for simple construction and our need for simplicity, believing that any other ornamentation applied provides falsity and takes away from its natural beauty.

9. The theories unify the human body and architecture as a whole and their interdependent relationship. What becomes relevant, are the elements that revert back to nature (the natural balance, proportion to our surroundings, as well as earthy materials that are used in construction) that together give us a sense of comfort. It becomes a contrast between systematic vs. theoretical concepts and a question of basics and true necessities in design.