Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Rochford Review : The story so far Northamptonshire Headteacher briefings 10 th + 11 th February 2016 Presented by Michael Thompson.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Rochford Review : The story so far Northamptonshire Headteacher briefings 10 th + 11 th February 2016 Presented by Michael Thompson."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Rochford Review : The story so far Northamptonshire Headteacher briefings 10 th + 11 th February 2016 Presented by Michael Thompson

2 What is it? Who is it for? Why is it? What isn’t it? Bottom line – what do you have to do this year? What’s coming next? Rochford Review

3 What is it? Who is it for? Review of statutory assessment arrangements for pupils working below the standard of national curriculum tests - chaired by Diane Rochford -established by the Minister for Schools in July 2015 to consider the best way to ensure that pupils who have not completed the relevant key stage programme of study, and are therefore working below the standard of statutory testing arrangements, have the opportunity to demonstrate attainment and progress at primary school The interim solution developed by the review follows the same principles as the interim teacher assessment frameworks. It creates additional pre-key stage standards for the frameworks which each contain a number of positive ‘pupil can’ statements. These statements reflect the attainment of pupils who have not yet completed the relevant programme of study but have reached the chronological age that requires a statutory assessment outcome to be reported. Rochford Review

4 What is it? (2) At Key Stage 1 … one additional standard … Working at greater depth at the expected standard Working at the expected standard Working towards the expected standard Foundations for the expected standard At Key Stage 1 … three additional standards … Working at greater depth at the expected standard (writing only) Working at the expected standard Working towards the expected standard (writing only) Growing development of the expected standard Early development of the expected standard Foundations for the expected standard Rochford Review

5 Why is it? Attempt at being inclusive now – not later as an afterthought – hence published interim guidance. Attempt to address two tricky assessment groups Below level of tests at chronological age “Beyond P8” but perpetually working towards or below the “expected level” Attempt to get one joined up system with shared vocabulary Rochford Review

6 What isn’t it? (1) A curriculum : “The interim solution is only to be used to report a statutory assessment outcome for specified pupils at the end of a key stage. It is not a curriculum and should not be used to guide teaching. The pre-key stage standards should not guide individual programmes of study, classroom practice or methodology.” A useful formative assessment - too broad and only end of Key Stage. “Following the removal of levels, the Department for Education has emphasised that the formative and summative assessment schools conduct day-to-day within key stages should not be tied to the format of statutory assessment at the end of key stages. In-school assessment serves a different purpose to statutory assessment. Its primary function is to support teaching and to help inform a shared understanding between teacher and pupil of what the pupil knows, and understands, where any gaps lie and what the pupil needs to do to progress.” Rochford Review

7 What isn’t it? (2) A P scales re-boot : “Although P scales were developed to align with the previous national curriculum. Schools have been told that these arrangements will stay in place for 2015-2016. The review will consider whether P Scales remain fit for purpose in the context of the new national curriculum as part of their longer term recommendations” A mechanism for exempting great numbers of pupils from National Curriculum tests : - “It is important to note that because the standard of the easiest questions remains the same as on previous tests, we are not expecting a significant increase in the number of pupils not sitting the tests. If pupils are able to answer the easiest questions, they should be entered for the tests.” Rochford Review

8 What do you have to do? Check against sample tests Use the Assessment materials For 2016, if a school decides not to enter a pupil for the tests, the interim pre-key stage standard should be used to provide a statutory assessment outcome for the pupil unless their attainment is being reported using P scales. Teachers must base their assessment judgement on a broad base of evidence from across the curriculum for each pupil. Individual pieces of work should be assessed according to the school’s assessment policy and not against these interim pre-key stage standards. To demonstrate that pupils have met a standard, teachers will need to have evidence that a pupil demonstrates attainment of all of the statements within the standard and the preceding standard. Rochford Review

9 What’s coming next? “In the next phase of its work, the Rochford Review will review P scales and consider whether any changes are required to ensure consistency with the new national curriculum and with broader statutory assessment arrangements” “The review will look to make longer term recommendations beyond 2016”. “The members of the review are keen to see one inclusive system of assessment” Rochford Review

10 Progression vs Continuity Rochford Review Progression Continuity eg could be P scales Eg increasingly independent 1-5 Or 5 different using and applying situations


Download ppt "The Rochford Review : The story so far Northamptonshire Headteacher briefings 10 th + 11 th February 2016 Presented by Michael Thompson."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google