Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Update on the interpretation of spacecraft potential during active control Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria MSSL, October 26 th, 2006 acknowledging.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Update on the interpretation of spacecraft potential during active control Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria MSSL, October 26 th, 2006 acknowledging."— Presentation transcript:

1 Update on the interpretation of spacecraft potential during active control Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria MSSL, October 26 th, 2006 acknowledging support from P.-A. Lindqvist, P.M.E. Décréau, I. Dandouras, A.N. Fazakerley, H. Kahn, H. Laakso, H. Jeszenszky, and the ASPOC, CIS, EFW, PEACE, and WHISPER Teams

2 Objective and Concept  Derive a method that allows to reconstruct the uncontrolled spacecraft potential (V sc ) from the residual, small variations of the controlled potential when ASPOC is turned on  Note: the estimation of density from V sc is another story. The method presented here shall only allow to use the usual formulas for density estimation from the spacecraft potential irrespective of the state of ASPOC  Find a representation V free =f(V ASPOC-ON ) which is robust against variations of plasma temperature, variations of the photoemission, and changes of the EFW bias current  The correction method ideally fulfils the following conditions:  small number of coefficients, ideally linear fitting  transformation is physically meaningful  Test the accuracy of the method for all conditions

3 Status  Initial presentation at CAA Calibration Meeting in March, 2006, and at COSPAR 2006.  Promising first results  A both reliable and practical conversion method is still to be found  Studies of various methods are ongoing  Accuracy and limitations of the finally chosen method need to be addressed

4 Change of spacecraft potential due to the ion beam (ASPOC)  Is the controlled spacecraft potential (C4) still usable as a proxy for density, and under which conditions ? ASPOC ON ASPOC OFF data show spacecraft-to-probe potential, spin-average

5 Simulation of spacecraft potential free- floating controlled  The potential controlled by a constant ion beam:  approaches a constant value at low n, independent of plasma  follows the uncontrolled potential at high density.  Curves shown are valid for 10 µA ion current on Cluster.

6 Spacecraft potential vs. density relation Spacecraft potential [V] Density [cm -3 ]  The variation of the potential following approximately was illustrated by Ishisaka et al. (2005) for Geotail. Overlay: previous model for ASPOC ON and OFF at 10, 100, and 1000 eV

7 Estimation of free floating potential from the controlled potential  The relation between controlled and uncontrolled potential is almost independent of electron temp. T e.  The correction term, f, for the potential V uncontrolled = V controlled + f(V controlled ) may be approximated over a wide range of spacecraft potentials by a simple exponential function.  Relation is still non- linear near V max (low density)  Results are less accurate in the steep part of the curve (near V max ).

8 C1 and C3, 2002-04-30  Original potential data; distance C1-C3  100 km  C1: free floating potential, C3: 12 µA ion beam

9 C1 and C3, 2002-04-30  Linear correlation C1 - C3

10 C1 and C3, 2002-04-30  Potential of C3 reconstructed by exponential fit  C1: ASPOC off, C3: 12 µA ion beam ?

11 C1, C4, 2001-04-02  C1: ASPOC OFF, C3: 12.5 µA C4: 10 µA  Potential of C4 reconstructed using coefficients from fit during this period original reconstructed  Time shift C1-C4 due to 600 km distance

12 Correlation of potentials when ASPOC ion beam is turned on  Instead of inter-spacecraft comparison, this method compares potential of one s/c over beam current changes  Plots shows all 0-12 µA transitions on Cluster 3 in 2001  Exponential correction is applicable even at high potentials

13 Discussion  Reconstruction of the free floating potential is possible, using a simple expression.  The coefficients c 1, c 2 vary with conditions.  c 1 varies mainly with the known ASPOC beam current  Would other representations provide better fits? Conditionc2c2 Range of controlled potential Theoretical model0.711... 6 V C3, summary of 20010.831... 8 V C4, summary of 20010.701... 8 V C3, 2002-04-301.194.5... 6.5 V C3, 2001-04-021.056.3... 7.6 V

14 C1 and C3, 2002-04-30  Cubic fit C1 - C3

15 C1 and C3, 2002-04-30  Potential of C3 reconstructed by cubic fit  C1: ASPOC off, C3: 12 µA ion beam ( )

16 C1 and C3, 2002-04-30  Fit (V free -V ASPOC ) as a function of (V max -V ASPOC )

17 C1 and C3, 2002-04-30  Potential of C3 reconstructed by fit to V max -V ASPOC  C1: ASPOC off, C3: 12 µA ion beam ? ( )

18 C1 and C3, 2002-04-30  Linear relation forced to match at min. and max. potential

19 C1 and C3, 2002-04-30  Potential of C3 reconstructed by linear relation enforced  C1: ASPOC off, C3: 12 µA ion beam between o o o ( )

20 Summary  The reconstruction of the free floating potential of a potential-controlled spacecraft is possible, using simple expressions  The errors are reasonably small, but there is not yet one single representation that gives optimum results in all conditions  Manual calibration may be needed for best results  Future work will aim at establishing appropriate correction terms for all periods with controlled spacecraft potential


Download ppt "Update on the interpretation of spacecraft potential during active control Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria MSSL, October 26 th, 2006 acknowledging."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google