Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

THE CHALLENGES OF NOWCASTING CONVECTION OVER THE OCEAN Huaqing Cai, Cathy Kessinger, Nancy Rehak, Daniel Megenhardt and Matthias Steiner National Center.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "THE CHALLENGES OF NOWCASTING CONVECTION OVER THE OCEAN Huaqing Cai, Cathy Kessinger, Nancy Rehak, Daniel Megenhardt and Matthias Steiner National Center."— Presentation transcript:

1 THE CHALLENGES OF NOWCASTING CONVECTION OVER THE OCEAN Huaqing Cai, Cathy Kessinger, Nancy Rehak, Daniel Megenhardt and Matthias Steiner National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO, USA Joint 2010 CWB weather Analysis and Forecasting and COAA 5 th International Ocean-Atmosphere Conference 28-30 June, 2010 Central Weather Bureau, Taipei ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study is supported by NASA ROSES and NASA ASAP program and in collaboration with NRL and MIT LL

2 Air France 447 (0145 UTC 1 June 2009) The wide-area view provided by real-time experimental Global Convection/Turbulence uplinks may have improved pilot situational awareness (approx.) Last verbal contact, 0133 UTC (approx.) Last ACARS message, 0214 UTC (approx.) Last verbal contact, 0133 UTC (approx.) Last ACARS message, 0214 UTC Longwave IR (0145 UTC) Cloud Top Height (0145 UTC) Convection Diagnosis Oceanic (CDO) 0145 UTC + + Motivation: Air France 447

3 “Wx Ahead” Uplink Message valid 0130 UTC 1 June 2009 /EXP CLOUD TOP FI AF447/AN NXXXAF 01 Jun 09 -- '/' Cloud tops 30,000 to 40,000 ft//////CCC///// 'C' Cloud tops above 40,000 ft///////////CC///// *4.0N,30.0W///////// *////////C////////// //*//CC///CCC///////// ///*CCCC/C/CC////////// ////*CCCCCCC//C///////// ///CC*CCCCC///CC//////// ///CCC*CCCCC///////////// //CCCCC*CCCC////////////// //CCCCCCC*CCC////////////// /CCCCCCCCC*CCC///// / //CCCCCCCCCC*CC///// // /// //CCCCCCCCCCC*C///////// ////// /////CCCCCCCCCC*C// // // ////// //////CCCCCCCC//*/ // / ////// CC//////CCCCCCC//* ///////// CCC////////////// * ///////// /C//////////// *1.3N,31.4W //// /////// */ *// / /*/// // /*/// / /*// * // * /// * // // * //// * ///// * ////// * ///// /// * /// Pos Rpt / // * / 0133 // X 1.4S,32.8W // Valid for // / 0130-0200z // Pilot feedback at url: http://[site deleted] Graphical view (EFB concept) Text-based view for ACARS printer 30-39Kft >40Kft /=30-39Kft C=>40Kft

4 Oceanic Diagnosis and Nowcasting System Convective Diagnosis Oceanic (CDO) identifies convective cells CDO Interest CDO Binary Product Convective Nowcasting Oceanic (CNO-Titan) makes 1-hr and 2-hr nowcasts of storm location using an object tracker (Titan) CNO- Titan Nowcast CNO-Gridded produces gridded nowcasts that will more closely resemble storm structures CNO- Gridded Nowcast CNO-RF Random Forest Nowcast CNO-RF utilizes environmental and model-based inputs to better predict storm initiation and decay [Cai et al. (2009)] CTopCClassGCD With Growth/Decay Without Growth/Decay

5 CNO Based on TITAN (Dixon and Wiener, 1993) TITAN for Radar Data An Example of 1 Hr CNO-TITAN *1 hr nowcast of CDO valid at 1315 UTC on August 19, 2007 using TITAN technique is shown on the right; red lines on the right represent CDO = 2.5 verification. *Advantages of TITAN: computationally efficient; capability of addressing growth/decay. *Disadvantages of TITAN: polygons can only roughly represent storm shapes; tends to over- forecasting

6 CNO Based on Modified TITAN---- Gridded Forecast An Example of 1 Hr CNO-Gridded Forecast TITAN Motion Vectors at t 0 Gridded 0 hr TITAN Motion Vectors Temporal & Spatial Smoothing 15-60 min Motion Vectors 15-60 min Forecasts by Advecting Original Satellite Data at t 0 Gridded 1 hr TITAN Motion Vectors Gridded 2 hr TITAN Motion Vectors Merged with GFS Winds Closest in Time Temporal & Spatial Smoothing Temporal & Spatial Smoothing 75-120 min Motion Vectors 135-180 min Motion Vectors 75-120 min Forecasts by Advecting 60 min Nowcasts 135-180 min Forecasts by Advecting 120 min Nowcasts Merged with GFS Winds Closest in Time 1-3 Hr CNO-Gridded Forecast Flow Chart *Advantages of CNO-Gridded: realistic looking storms; low bias. *Disadvantages of CNO-Gridded: could be computationally expensive; no explicit growth/decay capability

7 CNO Based on Random Forest Statistical Analysis and Data Fusion The random forest technique produces an ensemble of decision trees from labeled training instances –during training, RF generates estimates of predictor importance –RF trees “vote” on classification of new data points, comprising a nonlinear empirical model that provides both deterministic predictions and probabilistic information Vote: 1 => 40 votes for “0”, 60 votes for “1”; consensus category “1” Data pt. Tree 1 Vote: 0 Data pt. Tree 2 Vote: 0 Data pt. Tree 3 Vote: 1 Data pt. Tree 4 Vote: 0 Data pt. Tree 100 … *Slide courtesy of John Williams and Dave Ahijevych

8 An Example of CNO- RF Forecast Compared with CNO- TITAN ( 1 hr) *1 hr forecasts valid at 1315 UTC on August 19, 2007 for both techniques; Red lines represent CDO = 2.5 verification *Advantages of random forest technique: more realistic looking storms; taking into account of storm environment to address storm growth/decay. *As a relatively new, novel technique for nowcasting, its potential needs to be fully explored CNO Hurricane Dean A B C D A B C D CNO-RF CNO-TITAN

9 Statistical Evaluation of the Three Nowcasting Techniques CSIBIAS 5 days of data from Aug 19-23, 2007 over the Gulf of Mexico domain are used to calculate the statistics with a grid size of ~ 5 km and CDO threshold of 2.5 All three techniques show skill over persistence RF and gridded forecast perform best at 1 hr lead time TITAN is the best at 2-3 hr lead time Gridded forecast is the best for 4-6 hr lead time

10 Relative Skill Comparisons of Three Nowcasting Techniques versus Persistence Gridded and RF nowcasts ~10 % better than persistence at 1 hr lead time TITAN is the best for 2 and 3 hr lead time (~20-30% improvement) Gridded nowcasts the best for 4,5 and 6 hr lead time (~ 15-25% improvement) Overall, gridded technique seems to be the best performer

11 Examples of 1 hr Gridded Forecast over the Gulf of Mexico Domain * White lines are CDO=2.5 verification, satellite data available every 30 min A B C D Issue time: 1215 UTC 2009/09/05 Valid time: 1315 UTC 2009/09/05 1 HR

12 Examples of 3 hr Gridded Forecast over the Gulf of Mexico Domain *White lines are CDO=2.5 verification, satellite data available every 30 min A B C D Issue time: 1215 UTC 2009/09/05 Valid time: 1515 UTC 2009/09/05 3 HR

13 Examples of 6 hr Gridded Forecast over the Gulf of Mexico Domain *White lines are CDO=2.5 verification, satellite data available every 30 min A B C D Issue time: 1215 UTC 2009/09/05 Valid time: 1815 UTC 2009/09/05 6 HR

14 Examples of 3 hr CDO Forecasts Based on CNO- Gridded Technique in the West Pacific Domain *White lines are CDO=1.5 verification; Cloud class is not used in CDO *Satellite data are available every 3 hrs A B C D Issue time: 2100 UTC 2009/12/28 Valid time: 0000 UTC 2009/12/29 3 HR

15 Examples of 3 hr CDO Forecasts Based on CNO- Gridded Technique in the West Pacific Domain *White lines are CDO=1.5 verification; Cloud class is not used in CDO *Satellite data are available every 3 hrs A B C D Issue time: 0000 UTC 2009/12/29 Valid time: 0300 UTC 2009/12/29 3 HR

16 Examples of 3 hr CDO Forecasts Based on CNO- Gridded Technique in the West Pacific Domain *White lines are CDO=1.5 verification; Cloud class is not used in CDO *Satellite data are available every 3 hrs A B C D Issue time: 0300 UTC 2009/12/29 Valid time: 0600 UTC 2009/12/29 3 HR

17 Summary Statistics of CNO-Gridded Forecasts 30 days of data from Sep 1-30, 2009 over the Gulf of Mexico domain are used to calculate the statistics with a grid size of ~ 5 km and CDO threshold of 2.5 The results showed here could serve as benchmark performance of extrapolation-based nowcasting techniques for oceanic convection Similar verification for model forecasts need to be done so that a comparison of convective forecasting skills between model and extrapolation can be obtained The black squares are statistics from Aug 19-22, 2007 What are the GFS model scores for oceanic convection???

18 Summary and Future Work The challenges of nowcasting convection over the ocean at the current stage are caused by the lack of 1) high spatial and temporal resolution data; 2) the best way to identify convection over the ocean; and 3) the best way to blend observation-based extrapolating nowcasts with model-based convective forecasts. The nowcasting products need to be uplinked to transoceanic aircraft for situational awareness. Three nowcasting techniques (CNO-TITAN, CNO-Gridded and CNO- Random Forest) for oceanic convection forecasting in the 1-6 hr time frame are implemented, tested and compared in the Gulf of Mexico domain Based on the overall performance statistics, CNO-Gridded forecasts for 1-8 hr are implemented in the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific domain in the realtime Oceanic Diagnosis and Nowcasting System. The summary statistical performance of CNO-Gridded extrapolating technique could serve as benchmark for future blending work of GFS model and extrapolating for oceanic convection in 1-8 hr time frame.

19 Thanks for Your Attention! Questions and Comments?


Download ppt "THE CHALLENGES OF NOWCASTING CONVECTION OVER THE OCEAN Huaqing Cai, Cathy Kessinger, Nancy Rehak, Daniel Megenhardt and Matthias Steiner National Center."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google