1. Increasing interaction between lnternational students (IS) and Local students (LS) Ongoing Research in the English Language classroom.
Candy Gray
Department of Education and Children’s Services South Australia
Pedagogies of Connection
Alice Springs July 2008
I would like to acknowledge the original owners of this land now called Alice Springs, the <<arr-un-da>> people

2. Outline Connection: Who am I? Who are you? Who are we?
Background: Experiential and Academic influences
The hypotheses
The method
The results
Discussion
Conclusion
Evaluation of the process
Recommendations
References
Final quote

3. Connection: Who am I? (Who are you?) Who are we?
an opal miner, a tobacco picker, a tour guide, ..
single by choice (a serial monogamist)
a student of a second language
a B.A., Dip.Ed., M.A. in Applied Linguistics
a high school teacher
an EFL, ESL/EAL teacher, lecturer
motivated to find the best way to teach the English language without being a cultural imperialist and to these ends constantly reflect on own practice to evaluate and improve
operating in the role of colleague? with expertise?

4. Background: Experiential
limited interaction in university tutorial between LS and IS
limited interaction in university and high school grounds between IS and LS
limited interaction in mainstream high school classrooms between IS and LS
lack of activities in mainstream classrooms encouraging interaction
undervaluing of cultures not dominant in Australia
Takeda (2005) paper: “not enough acceptance that interaction across cultures is a two-way process” .. “the university has a role to play” .. “projects that require interaction in class”

5. Background: Academic influences
Illustration of Need [Cambridge RSA course in TEFL]
Learning Theory that “language is a social semiotic”
[Halliday, SFG, ESL Scope and Scales, GBT]
– a text is a piece of language in use
Learning Theory of language learning as Social Practices
Constructivism
Learning theory of ZPD (Vygotsky)
Scaffolding
Learning Theory that learning occurs in Communities of Practice
Inclusive practices
Learning Theory that the best pedagogy is one based on Connection

6. familiarisation with key concepts and terms clarification of purpose
Generic version of method to enable real interaction between IS and LS.
familiarisation with key concepts and terms
connection with
other participants
clarification of purpose
performance in roles

7. Generic version of method to enable real interaction
familiarisation with key concepts and terms
(Inclusive activities)
connection with
other participants
(Community of Practice; Pedagogy of Connection)
clarification of purpose
(Illustration of need; building on prior knowledge)
performance in roles
(Language as a social semiotic; knowledge creation; social practices; ZPD; scaffolding)

8. The hypotheses
enabling students to connect as a learning community in the classroom produces real talk between IS and LS [related to the role they are in (researcher, expert)]
real talk between IS and LS organised in the classroom promotes real talk outside the classroom [in other roles (teenager, classmate, global citizen..)]

9. Context Male and female students Average age 15 years
10 International students from ESL class from 7 different countries
10 Local students from mainstream English class (selected because classes on same line on school timetable)
Quiz, Survey + 2 x 50minute sessions

10. Familiarisation with key terms and concepts
Topic for research by students = Interaction between international students (IS) and local students (LS).
Familiarisation with key terms and concepts
Research:
[small group brainstorm and discuss definition –recorder, facilitator, checker; Research skills handout students highlight known vocabulary (all terms to be dealt with as they arise); paragraphing activity on text of a research method]
Interaction:
[concept map on where students speak English and with whom]
LS and IS:
[defined and ‘issues’ dealt with; quiz on numbers of language groups in school population; lists given post-quiz for analysis of numbers in different language groups; results of same quiz done by LS provided post-quiz for analysis]

11. Connection with other participants (1)
IS IS
class work in pairs and groups over one or two terms (this particular group)
pair/re-pair shouting activity to find voice (names, subjects, teachers, + spelling of)
find points in common (pairs competitive groups)
selection of partner for research activity

12. Clarification of purpose (1)
to identify an issue from the topic
to formulate a research question
ultimately, to discuss possible answers to the question with local students (in small groups) with all students acting as ‘experts’

13. Performance in Role (1): Researcher
Secondary source data:
Internet search for statistics on numbers of IS in South Australia
Internet search for existence of interaction between IS and LS
Primary source data:
brainstorm survey questions
conduct survey, collate responses, draw graphs of results, discuss graphs; identify a Research Question
brainstorm evidence of interaction from own experience
categorise the evidence
transfer categories of evidence to different sheets for small groups of LS and IS to work together on implementation of ideas from one chosen category

14. Connection with other participants (2)
IS LS
IS + LS quiz results shared (all as ignorant as each other of school statistics)
IS survey LS
find points in common (pairs group game)
selection of category of interest by individuals
student group according to chosen category (one IS + two LS) and exchange of names

15. Clarification of purpose (2)
aim to answer the Research Question - collaboration between LS and IS
operate as a group with a facilitator, a recorder, a spell and grammar checker

16. Performance in Role (2): collaborative experts (IS + LS)
read the evidence for the chosen category and add more ideas
brainstorm how to implement the ideas
discuss implementation ideas
list the best ideas according to your group decision
evaluate the interaction activity

17. Result 1: High quality content
language:
“in an assembly have a power point presentation, one per student, where they live (map) and information about them.” and “.. teach how to say some words like ‘Hi.’
history:
“learn about what caused IS to come to Australia”
food:
“have different kinds of food in the canteen ” .. “international students could teach a lesson in Home Economics to tell people how to make a delicious meal “ .. “share shopping lists” .. “have lessons where we talk about food in different places”
customs:
‘classes together where we teach each other different customs e.g. the difference between school systems”

18. Result 2: High level of participation
I observed:
a buzz in the room (a hive of activity)
no obvious unequal participation
all groups returned worksheets with increased evidence points and ideas for implementation
each group had a facilitator, a recorder and a spell and grammar checker
sustained concentration on task for varying amounts of time, one group approximately 40 minutes on task

19. Result 3: Effect on teacher (me)
I experienced
difficulty letting go
fear of handing over responsibility for the learning
I learned
I was not indispensable
students are more flexible and capable than I think

20. Discussion of results: Hypothesis 1:
enabling students to connect as a learning community in the classroom produces real talk between IS and LS related to the role they are in (researcher, expert).
The production of quality content and the high level of participation suggests real talk occurred.
It is considered likely that this is due to thoroughly preparing the IS enabling them to be participants, the perception by both LS and IS that it was a “two-way process", the constructivist nature of the task, no dominant cultural view and the fact that students were playing a legitimate (authentic) role; and that
small group discussion blending LS and IS allowed for scaffolding from “more capable peers” in how to contribute but not what to contribute, made possible by students feeling connected

21. Results from interviews 4 months after the interactive sessions.
IS + LS
100% 0%
remembered did not remember
the sessions the sessions
IS + LS
100% 0%
have communicated have not communicated
verbally with students verbally with students
from the other class from the other class in
in the interaction the interaction
ALLOW TIME FOR READING GRAPHS
All participants said that they enjoyed the sessions.

22. LS (with IS) IS (with LS)
Have you communicated with other IS / LS who were not involved in the interaction lessons in 2007?
LS (with IS) IS (with LS)
100%
60%
40%
Yes No Yes

23. Do you think communication with ESL international students / local students is made easier if you experience organised classroom interaction such as the activities in 2007?
LS IS
100%
40%
20%
definitely definitely possibly maybe
yes yes
This data seems to conflict with the previous data and is considered in the discussion.

24. Do you think you have a more positive attitude towards students from a different cultural background than yourself in general because of this kind of classroom interaction?
LS IS
100%
40%
20%
definitely definitely possibly maybe
yes yes
This data also seems to conflict with the previous data and is considered in the discussion.

25. Discussion of results: Hypothesis 2:
real talk between IS and LS organised in the classroom promotes real talk outside the classroom [in other roles (teenager, classmate, global citizen ..)]
Results are not conclusive for Hypothesis 2:
all students recalled the activities 4 months later
all students had communicated with ‘other’ participants
IS had communicated with ‘others’ who had not been involved despite saying that communication was not easier and that their attitude was not necessarily more positive
LS had not communicated with ‘others’ who had not been involved despite saying that communication was easier and their attitude more positive

26. Conclusion:
Using the prescribed method enabled students to connect as a learning community in the classroom and produced real talk between IS and LS [related to the role they were in (researcher, expert)] (Hypothesis 1)
Real talk between IS and LS organised in the classroom may promote real talk outside the classroom [in other roles (teenager, classmate, global citizen..)] (Hypothesis 2)

27. Evaluation: - + definitions of IS and LS can be problematic
the timing needs consideration (over two school terms) +
a valuable experience for LS due to their participation in interaction with IS and their expressed improvement of attitude
a valuable experience for IS due to their participation in interaction with LS and their exposure in this instance to research skills in a real context
in activities of the types described both IS and LS are presented with a view of a future in which they can play a part in knowledge creation; IS are presented with a view of a future in which they can be equal participants in classroom talk.
other teachers aware of student identity issues encouraged to take risks in alternative methods

28. Comments on interaction by LS (Year 8 audience to 11ESL presentations):
“.. a lot of fun .. enjoyed it a lot” .. “.. felt extremely comfortable ..” .. “I enjoyed the facts and felt like I extended my information of [ ] ..” .. “nice to know a bit about there (sic) culture ..” .. “.. we didn’t have to do any work ..” .. “.. I would like to learn more about there (sic) culture ..” .. “.. I’d like to learn more ..” .. “.. get to know more people ..” ..
Interesting to see that students did not regards this type of learning as ‘work’!
The next slide are comments from my current, ‘problematic’ ESL class after one the initial interaction sessions.

29. Comments on interaction by IS (Year 10ESL on collaborative task with Year 10English) re “Did you enjoy it?”:
“.. it was fun time for everybody I think” .. “..we can practise our English .. can know a lot of culture ..” .. “ I like spoke (sic) to the local students. They are fun.” .. “I like this activity. It can make more and more friends.” .. “I want to talk with them again.” .. “I was pleased to have such an opportunity to communicate with a local student. It’s good for the growth of your English.” .. “we can practise our English and improve it.”

30. Recommendations
authentic interactive practices of high-school subjects need to be identified by subject and EAL teachers in collaboration and used as mainstream class activities
thorough (inclusive) preparation pre-activity is essential
if a priority of education is to enable life-long learning by independent learners then the learning theory behind our curricular warrants revision
a combination of learning theories to guide pedagogy may be optimal
true internationalisation of curricula would support the described method

31. Reference List
Cadman, K. (2008) From Correcting to Connecting: A personal story of changing priorities in teaching English as an Additional Language in TESOL in Context Vol. 17 No.2 February
Derewianka, B. (1990) Rocks in the Head: Children and the language of Geology in Carter, R. Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum Hodder and Stoughton UK
Doria, C. (2005) The Truth about being an International Student Globally United Melbourne
Douglas, A. (2000) Learning as Participation in Social Practices: interpreting student perspectives on learning in Changing English, Vol. 7, No. 2:
Hammond, J. (ed.) (2001) Scaffolding – teaching and learning in language and literacy education PETA NSW
Jones, B. (2006) A Thinking Reed Allen & Unwin NSW page 272
Kalantzis, M. and Cope, B. (eds.) (1993) The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing The Falmer Press UK
I put it on two pages so that you could read it.

32. Reference List continued
Lave, J.(1991) Situating Learning in Communities of Practice in Resnick et al (eds) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition
Mickan, P., Petrescu, I & Timoney, J. (eds) (2006) Social Practices, pedagogy and language use: studies in socialisation Lythrum Press Adelaide
Rogoff, B. (1994) Developing Understanding of the Idea of Communities of Learners in Mind, Culture, and Activity Vol.1, No. 4 Fall pp
Sit, M., Mickan, P., Gray, C. (2005) Building Academic Discourse Skills in Chat Rooms in Poedjosoedarmo, G. (Ed) Innovative Approaches to Reading and Writing Instruction Anthology Series 46 SEAMEO Regional Language Centre RELC Singapore
Takeda, K (2005) Report on Interaction between Local and International Students Adelaide University Overseas Students’ Association
Teramoto, H. (forthcoming) Exploring new arrival-ness: How new arrivals are turned into “New Arrivals”. A Doctoral Thesis manuscript.
The Advertiser (2008) The 2020 Summit. Monday April 21st page 4
Wenger, E. (n.d.) accessed on 28th April 2006

33. Jones, Barry A Thinking Reed 2006:272
A final word:
To quote Barry Jones:
“An innate sense of inadequacy holds people back from new experiences.”
Jones, Barry A Thinking Reed 2006:272
This refers to both students and educators. Who am I to tell you what I think? If I dwell too long on this I may not speak.
If social theories of learning are what is needed to make our mainstream classrooms better places of learning then it means we must become instruments for change and encourage mainstream teachers to review the learning theory behind their curricula and/or encourage acceptance of an expertise outside their domain.
I hope you have found some value.