Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Coronary Artery Disease

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Coronary Artery Disease"— Presentation transcript:

1 Coronary Artery Disease
UHCW Cardiology Teaching Dr Chris McAloon

2 Case One 65 year old man Playing golf Sudden onset chest pain
Crushing, central, severe Vomiting No previous chest pain HTN, Ex-Smoker Otherwise well GTN helped – not resolved

3 History – what information do you need to elicit?
Pain Character / Radiation / GTN spray effect Was this pain like your previous Angina/ MI pain? Autonomic features Risk factors Smoker / Hypertension / Diabetes Hyperlipidaemia / Family history Previous MI / CABG / PCI / CVA Differentials What makes cardiac chest pain? What does PCI and CANG stand for? What differentials do you have for chest pain? What differentials do they get?

4 Cardiac Sounding Chest Pain
Central Crushing Chest Pain Exertional chest pain Occurs at rest Radiation Neck, arms (classically left) Levine’s Sign Clenched fist over chest Breathless Autonomic features

5 Isn’t Chest Pain always ACS?
ECS ACS NTE Guidelines 2011

6 Examination Nicotine Stains GTN spray Xanthelasma Scar’s Evidence DM
Chest Legs Evidence DM BP/ Pulse/ Failure

7 Examination 65 year old 35 year old Valve/ Congenital surgery CABG
Ankles/shins for SVG scar Radial for graft scar CABG 35 year old Metallic Click Look left lateral Cyanosis etc Valve/ Congenital surgery

8 Acute Coronary Syndrome
ECS ACS Guidelines 2011

9 ESC Definition ACS Pain
ECS ACS Guidelines 2011

10 Pathophysiology ACS Spectrum of acute coronary syndromes according to electrocardiographic and biochemical markers of myocardial necrosis (troponin T, troponin I, and creatine kinase MB), in patients presenting with acute cardiac chest pain Grech E D , Ramsdale D R BMJ 2003;326: ©2003 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

11 Plaque and Thrombin Formation
Ischaemic Heart Disease Diagram of an unstable plaque with superimposed luminal thrombus Unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction are generally associated with white, platelet-rich, and only partially occlusive thrombus. Microthrombi can detach and embolise downstream, causing myocardial ischaemia and infarction. In contrast, ST segment elevation (or Q wave) myocardial infarction has red, fibrin-rich, and more stable occlusive thrombus. Grech E D , Ramsdale D R BMJ 2003;326: ©2003 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

12 Ruptured Atheromatous Plaque and Occlusive Thrombus
STEMI Histological appearance of a ruptured atheromatous plaque (bottom arrow) and occlusive thrombus (top arrow) resulting in acute myocardial infarction Occlusion epicardial artery Grech E D , Ramsdale D R BMJ 2003;326: ©2003 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

13 ECG: ST elevation ECG Changes Site of Infarction Vessel Occluded V1-V3
Anteroseptal LAD V4, V5, AVL, I Anterior Lateral LAD, diagonal Widespread 1, AVL, V1-V6 Large Anterior Prox LAD (could be LMS - Pump probs II, III, AVF Inferior RCA (or Cx) - Bradyarrhythmia ↓ ST V1-V2 ↑ ST in post leads Posterior NB remember Cx occlusion can be silent on the ECG

14 ANTERIOR STEMI ST elevation V1-V6, reciprocal changes in II, III, AVF

15 Infero-posterior STEMI ST elevation in II, III and AF, R wave and ST depression in V1-2

16 Size of the Problem: England and Wales 2009-10
STEMI 31,412 in Frequency falling NSTEMI Estimated 100, 000 in Recorded frequency rising 50% not managed on ACU/ CCU BCS Recommendations Acute Coronary Care Oct 2011

17 30 Day Mortality Mortality rate of STEMI and NSTEMI simliar at 30 days
BCS Recommendations Acute Coronary Care Oct 2011

18 STEMI Initial Diagnosis
Regional wall abnormalities occur within seconds coronary arter occlusion ECS ACS STE Guidelines 2011

19 300mg Aspirin/ 600mg Clopidogrel Reperfusion: PCI / Fibrinolysis
Management of STEMI THINK REPERFUSION STRATEGY: ■ Primary PCI if available (CALL THE CATH LAB) ■ Thrombolysis if not, then refer to PCI centre (GTN) High Flow Oxygen (15L) 300mg Aspirin/ 600mg Clopidogrel Analgesia: Morphine + Metoclopramide Reperfusion: PCI / Fibrinolysis

20 STEMI Management Successful Thrombolysis
ST segment resolution 50% at 90 minutes ECS Revasculration Guidelines 2011

21 Standards STEMI Management
Direct paramedic transfer to PPCI centre or timely inter-hospital transfer PPCI with first medical contact-to-balloon time <120 minutes Monitoring on CCU (including for repatriated patients) Early initiation of secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation ECS Revasculration Guidelines 2011

22 The Changing Face STEMI Mx
BCS Recommendations Acute Coronary Care Oct 2011

23 The Changing Face STEMI Mx
95% England covered by PPCI networks Thrombolysis remains in place in remote centres Geography impacts time to PPCI centre 30% Thrombolysis fail to reperfuse and need immediate rescue PCI

24 ECS ACS STE Guidelines 2011

25 What is Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)?
Disruption of occlusion using a balloon Stent deployed to maintain anterograde blood flow Types Primary PCI – PCI within 2 hours Rescue PCI – PCI after failed thrombolysis Facilitated PCI – PCI bridged with lytic therapy Time delayed PPCI

26 Distal Embolisation of a Platelet-Rich Thrombus causing Occlusion of Intramyocardial Arteriole
NSTEMI Distal embolisation of a platelet-rich thrombus causing occlusion of intramyocardial arteriole (arrow). Such an event may result in micro-infarction and elevation of markers of myocardial necrosis Grech E D , Ramsdale D R BMJ 2003;326: ©2003 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

27 Case Two 48 year old lady Shopping Central dull Pain on walking
Not relieved GTN spray Gets on exertion normally Recently distant decreasing to onset pain Pain last night in bed

28 Worrying ECG? Electrocardiogram of a 48 year old woman with unstable angina (top). Note the acute ischaemic changes in leads V1 to V5 (arrows). Coronary angiography revealed a severe mid-left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis (arrow, bottom left), which was successfully stented (bottom right)‏ Grech E D , Ramsdale D R BMJ 2003;326: ©2003 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

29 What do you do as the SHO clerking patient in A+E?

30 Defining Angina Pectoris
Stable Angina pattern of frequency, intensity, ease of provocation, or duration does not change over several weeks Accelerating Angina  change in the pattern of stable angina greater ease of provocation, more prolonged episodes, and episodes of greater severity or more frequent use of sublingual GTN Unstable Angina  pattern of chest pain changes abruptly

31 Three Presentations UA
Angina at rest—Also prolonged, usually > 20 minutes Angina of new onset—At least CCS class III in severity Angina increasing—Previously diagnosed angina that has become more frequent, longer in duration, or lower in threshold (change in severity by > 1 CCS class to at least CCS class III)

32 Angina Pectoris CCS Classification
Class I – Pain strenuous exertion Class II – Slight limitation ordinary exertion Class III – Marked limitation physical exertion Class IV – Pain on any exertion CCS = Canadian Cardiology Society The anaerobic threshold is crossed and the patient develops symptomatic angina pectoris.  Supply and demand

33 TIMI Risk Score ≥3 risk factors for coronary artery disease
≥50% coronary stenosis on angiography ST segment change >0.5 mm ≥2 anginal episodes in 24 hours before presentation Elevated serum concentration of cardiac markers Use of aspirin in 7 days before presentation

34 High TIMI score and Mortality
Rates of death from all causes and non-fatal myocardial infarction at 14 days, by TIMI risk score. Note sharp rate increase when score ≥ 3 Grech E D , Ramsdale D R BMJ 2003;326: ©2003 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

35 Bleeding Risk Crusade bleeding score ECS ACS Guidelines 2011

36 NSTEMI Outcome Based Location
BCS Recommendations Acute Coronary Care Oct 2011

37 Simplified management pathway for patients with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Simplified management pathway for patients with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction Grech E D , Ramsdale D R BMJ 2003;326: ©2003 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

38 Acute Management of NSTEMI-ACS
Aspirin 300mg Clopidogrel 300mg (600mg if going to the lab) LMWH Bisoprolol / Atorvastatin 80mg ON/ ACE/ARB (can be next day) GTN Spray/ Infusion HIGH RISK patients: GPIIbIIIa Cath Lab within 48-96hrs

39 Timing Early Invasive Strategy
High risk (GRACE >140) within 24 hours At Stafford discuss with Stoke Intermediate risk (GRACE < 140) and high risk criterion within 72 hours Low risk with recurrent symptoms Stress Test

40 Anti-thrombotic Therapy
ECS ACS Guidelines 2011

41 Prasugrel Thienopyridine related to Clopidogrel
Active metabolite irreversible inhibitor of ADP receptor Effective when Clopidogrel Resistance More rapid/ greater/ more consistent platelet inhibition No drug interactions Licensed used STEMI going PPCI

42 Prasugrel vs Clopidogrel
Figure 1. Cumulative Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rates of Key Study End Points during the Follow-up Period. Panel A shows data for the primary efficacy end point (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], or nonfatal stroke) (top) and for the key safety end point (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] major bleeding not related to coronary-artery bypass grafting) (bottom) during the full follow-up period. The hazard ratio for prasugrel, as compared with clopidogrel, for the primary efficacy end point at 30 days was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.88; P<0.001) and at 90 days was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.90; P<0.001). Data for the primary efficacy end point are also shown from the time of randomization to day 3 (Panel B) and from 3 days to 15 months, with all end points occurring before day 3 censored (Panel C). In Panel C, the number at risk includes all patients who were alive (regardless of whether a nonfatal event had occurred during the first 3 days after randomization) and had not withdrawn consent for follow-up. The P values in Panel A for the primary efficacy end point were calculated with the use of the Gehan-Wilcoxon test; all other P values were calculated with the use of the log-rank test. Wiviott SD et al. N Engl J Med 2007;357:

43 Prasugrel vs Clopidogrel
Figure 2. Hazard Ratios and Rates of the Primary End Point, According to Selected Subgroups of Study Patients. The primary end point was defined as death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke. The percentages are Kaplan-Meier estimates of the rate of the end point at 15 months. For each subgroup, the size of the square is proportional to the number of patients in the subgroups and represents the point estimate of the treatment effect. The overall treatment effect of prasugrel as compared with clopidogrel is represented by the diamond, and the dashed vertical line represents the corresponding overall point estimate. None of the P values for interactions were significant. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-receptor antagonist use was that during the index hospitalization. Wiviott SD et al. N Engl J Med 2007;357:

44 Ticagrelor Cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine
Reversible inhibitor of ADP receptor Rapid/ Predictable action CYP450 interaction NICE approval October 2011 ACS

45 Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel
Figure 1. Cumulative Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Time to the First Adjudicated Occurrence of the Primary Efficacy End Point. The primary end point - a composite of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke - occurred significantly less often in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (9.8% vs. 11.7% at 12 months; hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.92; P<0.001). Wallentin L et al. N Engl J Med 2009;361:

46 Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel
Figure 2. Cumulative Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Time to the First Major Bleeding End Point, According to the Study Criteria. The time was estimated from the first dose of the study drug in the safety population. The hazard ratio for major bleeding, defined according to the study criteria, for the ticagrelor group as compared with the clopidogrel group was 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.13). Wallentin L et al. N Engl J Med 2009;361:

47 Prescribing in CKD ECS ACS Guidelines 2011

48 Secondary Prevention for IHD
Immediately Aspirin ± PPI (Bleeding risk) Clopidogrel (12 months) B Blocker ACEi- if intolerant give ARB Atorvastatin 80mg GTN Spray PRN 15 minute rule Lifestyle Diet Physical Activity Stop Smoking Cardiac Rehab Sex and stairs rule

49 Summary Definitions ACS Incidence and Prevalence Pathophysiology
Differential Diagnoses STEMI Intervention – current evidence NSTEMI intervention – current evidence Antithrombotic therapy use New anti-thrombotics

50


Download ppt "Coronary Artery Disease"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google